Cognitive Determinants of Dysarthria in Parkinson's Disease: An Automated Machine Learning Approach. Issue 12 (14th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: García, Adolfo M.; Arias‐Vergara, Tomás; C. Vasquez‐Correa, Juan; Nöth, Elmar; Schuster, Maria; Welch, Ariane E.; Bocanegra, Yamile; Baena, Ana; Orozco‐Arroyave, Juan R.
• Is Part Of: Movement disorders. Volume 36:Issue 12(2021)
• Page Start: 2862
• Page End: 2873
• Publication Date: 2021-08-14
• Subjects: Parkinson's disease -- dysarthria -- automated speech analysis -- mild cognitive impairment -- cognitive demands; Movement disorders -- Periodicals; 610
• DOI: 10.1002/mds.28751
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0885-3185

Abstract

ABSTRACT: Background: Dysarthric symptoms in Parkinson's disease (PD) vary greatly across cohorts. Abundant research suggests that such heterogeneity could reflect subject‐level and task‐related cognitive factors. However, the interplay of these variables during motor speech remains underexplored, let alone by administering validated materials to carefully matched samples with varying cognitive profiles and combining automated tools with machine learning methods. Objective: We aimed to identify which speech dimensions best identify patients with PD in cognitively heterogeneous, cognitively preserved, and cognitively impaired groups through tasks with low (reading) and high (retelling) processing demands. Methods: We used support vector machines to analyze prosodic, articulatory, and phonemic identifiability features. Patient groups were compared with healthy control subjects and against each other in both tasks, using each measure separately and in combination. Results: Relative to control subjects, patients in cognitively heterogeneous and cognitively preserved groups were best discriminated by combined dysarthric signs during reading (accuracy = 84% and 80.2%). Conversely, patients with cognitive impairment were maximally discriminated from control subjects when considering phonemic identifiability during retelling (accuracy = 86.9%). This same pattern maximally distinguished between cognitively spared and impaired patients (accuracy = 72.1%). Also, cognitive (executive) symptom severity was predicted by prosody in cognitively preserved patients and by phonemic identifiability in cognitively heterogeneous and impaired groups. No measure predicted overall motor dysfunction in any group. Conclusions: Predominant dysarthric symptoms appear to be best captured through undemanding tasks in cognitively heterogeneous and preserved cohorts and through cognitively loaded tasks in patients with cognitive impairment. Further applications of this framework could enhance dysarthria assessments in PD. © 2021 International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society