Trust and tribulation: Racial identity centrality, institutional trust, and support for candidates in the 2020 US presidential election. Issue 1 (24th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Blankenship, Benjamin T.; Davis, Tangier; Areguin, Maira A.; Savaş, Özge; Winter, David; Stewart, Abigail J.
• Is Part Of: Analyses of social issues and public policy. Volume 21:Issue 1(2021)
• Page Start: 64
• Page End: 98
• Publication Date: 2021-06-24
• Subjects: Social policy -- Psychological aspects -- Periodicals; Social psychology -- Periodicals; 361.6105
• DOI: 10.1111/asap.12256
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1529-7489

Abstract

Abstract: We examined how racial‐ethnic identity centrality, or the importance of race/ethnicity in people's self‐perceptions, affected peoples' support for the Democratic and Republican candidates in the 2020 US election. We explored this association by examining the mediating role of trust in important social institutions. In Study 1, we examined these effects by comparing the pattern of relationships among people of color (POC) and white people, using a sample of 177 Amazon Mechanical Turk (MTurk) participants. In Study 2, we expanded our focus on different racial‐ethnic groups, by comparing effects for Black, Latinx, Asian American/Pacific Islander (AAPI), and white participants, using a sample of 530 MTurk workers. Although there were a few findings that ran contrary to our expectations, the two studies generally found that trust in institutions that challenge the status quo, such as the media, explained the relationship between identity centrality and support for candidates among POC, especially Black and Latinx participants. We also found that trust in institutions that uphold the status quo, such as police and courts, explained the relationship between racial‐ethnic identity centrality and support for candidates among white people.