Cognitive training and remediation interventions for substance use disorders: a Delphi consensus study. (28th December 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Verdejo‐Garcia, Antonio; Rezapour, Tara; Giddens, Emily; Khojasteh Zonoozi, Arash; Rafei, Parnian; Berry, Jamie; Caracuel, Alfonso; Copersino, Marc L.; Field, Matt; Garland, Eric L.; Lorenzetti, Valentina; Malloy‐Diniz, Leandro; Manning, Victoria; Marceau, Ely M.; Pennington, David L.; Strickland, Justin C.; Wiers, Reinout; Fairhead, Rahia; Anderson, Alexandra; Bell, Morris; Boendermaker, Wouter J.; Brooks, Samantha; Bruno, Raimondo; Campanella, Salvatore; Cousijn, Janna; Cox, W. Miles; Dean, Andrew C.; Ersche, Karen D.; Franken, Ingmar; Froeliger, Brett; Gamito, Pedro; Gladwin, Thomas E.; Goncalves, Priscila D.; Houben, Katrijn; Jacobus, Joanna; Jones, Andrew; Kaag, Anne M.; Lindenmeyer, Johannes; McGrath, Elly; Nardo, Talia; Oliveira, Jorge; Pennington, Charlotte R.; Perrykkad, Kelsey; Piercy, Hugh; Rupp, Claudia I.; Schulte, Mieke H. J.; Squeglia, Lindsay M.; Staiger, Petra; Stein, Dan J.; Stein, Jeff; Stein, Maria; Stoops, William W.; Sweeney, Mary; Witkiewitz, Katie; Woods, Steven P.; Yi, Richard; Zhao, Min; Ekhtiari, Hamed;
• Is Part Of: Addiction. Volume 118:Number 5(2023)
• Page Start: 935
• Page End: 951
• Publication Date: 2022-12-28
• Subjects: Cognitive remediation -- cognitive training -- Delphi method -- interventions -- neuroscience -- treatment; Alcoholism -- Periodicals; Drug addiction -- Periodicals; 616.86
• DOI: 10.1111/add.16109
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0965-2140

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Substance use disorders (SUD) are associated with cognitive deficits that are not always addressed in current treatments, and this hampers recovery. Cognitive training and remediation interventions are well suited to fill the gap for managing cognitive deficits in SUD. We aimed to reach consensus on recommendations for developing and applying these interventions. Design, Setting and Participants: We used a Delphi approach with two sequential phases: survey development and iterative surveying of experts. This was an on‐line study. During survey development, we engaged a group of 15 experts from a working group of the International Society of Addiction Medicine (Steering Committee). During the surveying process, we engaged a larger pool of experts ( n = 54) identified via recommendations from the Steering Committee and a systematic review. Measurements: Survey with 67 items covering four key areas of intervention development: targets, intervention approaches, active ingredients and modes of delivery. Findings: Across two iterative rounds (98% retention rate), the experts reached a consensus on 50 items including: (i) implicit biases, positive affect, arousal, executive functions and social processing as key targets of interventions; (ii) cognitive bias modification, contingency management, emotion regulation training and cognitive remediation as preferred approaches; (iii) practice, feedback, difficulty‐titration, bias modification, goal‐setting, strategy learning and meta‐awareness as active ingredients; and (iv) both addiction treatment work‐force and specialized neuropsychologists facilitating delivery, together with novel digital‐based delivery modalities. Conclusions: Expert recommendations on cognitive training and remediation for substance use disorders highlight the relevance of targeting implicit biases, reward, emotion regulation and higher‐order cognitive skills via well‐validated intervention approaches qualified with mechanistic techniques and flexible delivery options.