Hemisphere-Dependent Ictal Tachycardia Versus Ictal Bradycardia in a Critically Ill Patient. Issue 4 (3rd May 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Fong, Michael W. K.; Norris, Sarah; Percy, Jennifer; Hirsch, Lawrence J.; Herlopian, Aline
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical neurophysiology. Volume 39:Issue 4(2022)
• Page Start: e15
• Page End: e18
• Publication Date: 2022-05-03
• Subjects: Ictal tachycardia -- Ictal bradycardia -- Continuous EEG; Electroencephalography -- Periodicals; Neurophysiology -- Periodicals; Electroencephalography -- Periodicals; Electroencephalography; Periodicals; 612.805
• DOI: 10.1097/WNP.0000000000000873
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0736-0258

Abstract

Summary: Tachycardia is a common ictal phenomenon; however, ictal bradycardia is less commonly reported and rarely presents as ictal asystole/syncope. In critically ill patients, seizures are much less likely to manifest with overt clinical signs, i.e., are more likely to be subtle or nonconvulsive. In this setting, changes in heart rate may be the only clue that seizures are occurring. The authors report an exemplary case of a 78-year-old right-handed man who presented with spontaneous left frontal intraparenchymal hemorrhages. During standard clinical monitoring in the Neuro-Intensive Care Unit, the patient had discrete paroxysms of relative sinus tachycardia, independent episodes of sinus bradycardia, and 3 to 4 seconds of sinus pause. The cardiac investigation was unrevealing, but continuous EEG revealed the answer. The episodes of mild tachycardia were associated with seizures from the left temporal region, whereas those with bradycardia were associated with independent seizures from the right temporal region. The case stands as a stark reminder to remain vigilant of seizures in high-risk patients, especially as a cause for paroxysmal autonomic changes.