Disparities in Rates of Fusions in Single-Level Lumbar Disc Pathologies. (1st September 2019)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Disparities in Rates of Fusions in Single-Level Lumbar Disc Pathologies. (1st September 2019)
- Main Title:
- Disparities in Rates of Fusions in Single-Level Lumbar Disc Pathologies
- Authors:
- Kim, Soobin
Ryoo, James S
Ostrov, Philip B
Reddy, Abhinav K
Mehta, Ankit Indravadan - Abstract:
- Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Single-level lumbar disc pathologies are managed surgically through decompression (lumbar discectomy or laminectomy) and a potential fusion. However, there is a lack of evidence for or against fusion after decompression in specific patient populations. This study seeks to observe disparities in the rates of fusion after decompression. METHODS: Patients requiring surgical treatment for single-level disc herniation or degeneration were queried from the National Inpatient Sample datasets spanning 2012 to 2015. Multivariate logistic regression (with a Holm-Bonferroni correction) was performed to assess effects of patient demographics, temporality of admission, and hospital characteristics on rates of lumbar fusion while controlling for patient-level medical comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 84 336 patients were included in the analysis of indicators for fusion after elective and nonelective surgical intervention for lumbar disc pathologies. Patients in private for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals were more likely to receive a fusion compared to those in public hospitals for elective cases (OR 1.20, P < .001; OR 1.21, P < .001, respectively). Nonelective patients in urban teaching and nonteaching hospitals were less likely to receive a fusion compared to those in rural hospitals (OR 0.49, P < .001; OR 0.54, P < .001, respectively). In both elective and nonelective cases, weekend admissions were less likely to receive fusions than weekday admissionsAbstract: INTRODUCTION: Single-level lumbar disc pathologies are managed surgically through decompression (lumbar discectomy or laminectomy) and a potential fusion. However, there is a lack of evidence for or against fusion after decompression in specific patient populations. This study seeks to observe disparities in the rates of fusion after decompression. METHODS: Patients requiring surgical treatment for single-level disc herniation or degeneration were queried from the National Inpatient Sample datasets spanning 2012 to 2015. Multivariate logistic regression (with a Holm-Bonferroni correction) was performed to assess effects of patient demographics, temporality of admission, and hospital characteristics on rates of lumbar fusion while controlling for patient-level medical comorbidities. RESULTS: A total of 84 336 patients were included in the analysis of indicators for fusion after elective and nonelective surgical intervention for lumbar disc pathologies. Patients in private for-profit and not-for-profit hospitals were more likely to receive a fusion compared to those in public hospitals for elective cases (OR 1.20, P < .001; OR 1.21, P < .001, respectively). Nonelective patients in urban teaching and nonteaching hospitals were less likely to receive a fusion compared to those in rural hospitals (OR 0.49, P < .001; OR 0.54, P < .001, respectively). In both elective and nonelective cases, weekend admissions were less likely to receive fusions than weekday admissions (OR 0.35, P < .001; OR 0.46, P < .001, respectively). Compared to hospitals in New England, hospitals in East North Central, South Atlantic, and East South Central regions had higher rates of elective fusion (OR 1.29, 1.50, and 2.09, respectively; P < .001 for all), while hospitals in the Pacific and West South Central regions had lower rates of fusion (OR 0.56, P < .001; OR 0.50, P < .001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The results of this study illustrate disparities that exist in fusion after the surgical intervention of lumbar disc pathologies in terms of patient demographics and hospital characteristics. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Neurosurgery. Volume 66(2010)Supplement 1
- Journal:
- Neurosurgery
- Issue:
- Volume 66(2010)Supplement 1
- Issue Display:
- Volume 66, Issue 1 (2010)
- Year:
- 2010
- Volume:
- 66
- Issue:
- 1
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2010-0066-0001-0000
- Page Start:
- Page End:
- Publication Date:
- 2019-09-01
- Subjects:
- Nervous system -- Surgery -- Periodicals
617.48005 - Journal URLs:
- https://academic.oup.com/neurosurgery ↗
http://www.neurosurgery-online.com ↗
https://journals.lww.com/neurosurgery/pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1093/neuros/nyz310_710 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0148-396X
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 6081.582000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26975.xml