Semantic Speech Networks Linked to Formal Thought Disorder in Early Psychosis. (22nd March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nettekoven, Caroline R; Diederen, Kelly; Giles, Oscar; Duncan, Helen; Stenson, Iain; Olah, Julianna; Gibbs-Dean, Toni; Collier, Nigel; Vértes, Petra E; Spencer, Tom J; Morgan, Sarah E; McGuire, Philip
• Is Part Of: Schizophrenia bulletin. Volume 49(2023)Supplement 2
• Page Start: S142
• Page End: S152
• Publication Date: 2023-03-22
• Subjects: natural language processing -- formal thought disorder -- disorganized speech -- graph theory -- psychosis; Schizophrenia -- Periodicals; Schizophrenia -- Research -- Periodicals; 616.898005
• DOI: 10.1093/schbul/sbac056
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0586-7614

Abstract

Abstract: Background and Hypothesis: Mapping a patient's speech as a network has proved to be a useful way of understanding formal thought disorder in psychosis. However, to date, graph theory tools have not explicitly modelled the semantic content of speech, which is altered in psychosis. Study Design: We developed an algorithm, " netts, " to map the semantic content of speech as a network, then applied netts to construct semantic speech networks for a general population sample ( N = 436), and a clinical sample comprising patients with first episode psychosis (FEP), people at clinical high risk of psychosis (CHR-P), and healthy controls (total N = 53). Study Results: Semantic speech networks from the general population were more connected than size-matched randomized networks, with fewer and larger connected components, reflecting the nonrandom nature of speech. Networks from FEP patients were smaller than from healthy participants, for a picture description task but not a story recall task. For the former task, FEP networks were also more fragmented than those from controls; showing more connected components, which tended to include fewer nodes on average. CHR-P networks showed fragmentation values in-between FEP patients and controls. A clustering analysis suggested that semantic speech networks captured novel signals not already described by existing NLP measures. Network features were also related to negative symptom scores and scores on the Thought and Language Index, although these relationships did not survive correcting for multiple comparisons. Conclusions: Overall, these data suggest that semantic networks can enable deeper phenotyping of formal thought disorder in psychosis. Whilst here we focus on network fragmentation, the semantic speech networks created by Netts also contain other, rich information which could be extracted to shed further light on formal thought disorder. We are releasing Netts as an open Python package alongside this manuscript.