Analysis of subsurface velocity using CMP gathers picked up by unshielded GPR system: results from an experimental NAPL contaminated test site. Issue 3 (4th May 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Iqbal, Ibrar; Xiong, Bin; Tian, Gang; Lu, Yuguo; Yang, Yang
• Is Part Of: Exploration geophysics. Volume 54:Issue 3(2023)
• Page Start: 261
• Page End: 270
• Publication Date: 2023-05-04
• Subjects: GPR configuration -- velocity analysis -- geophysical test -- subsurface contamination -- non-aqueous phase liquid (NAPL) -- common midpoint (CMP); Geophysics -- Periodicals; Prospecting -- Geophysical methods -- Periodicals; 622.15
• DOI: 10.1080/08123985.2022.2131390
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0812-3985

Abstract

Abstract : Adequate knowledge of velocity is required for accurate data imaging and depth conversion, as well as for quantifying the distribution of soil water content. Without complementary borehole information in the form of dielectric permittivity and/or porosity logs along the profile, it is currently impossible to reliably estimate the high-frequency electromagnetic velocity distribution in the probed subsurface region. Here, we present a new method for calculating the precise subsurface velocity structure from ground penetrating radar (GPR) reflection data that does not require boreholes or log data. This study investigates the ability of the pulse_EKKO PRO GPR system to predict a vertical profile for the possible velocity estimation of a layered and contaminated geophysical test site in Hangzhou, China. All data were acquired and saved on the GPR system in various files (projects) before analysis using GPR software to obtain approximated velocity modelling using common midpoint (CMP) gathers. Using the velocity spectrum analysis, a vertical profile of the interval velocities can be derived from each CMP gather. The findings of this study indicate that the proposed method is effective and sustainable. Furthermore, owing to the efficacy of the method in terms of field effort and computational complexity, it can easily be expanded to 3D GPR velocity exploration, increasing its importance in comparison to standard offset-based techniques for estimating velocity using GPR.