The Myth of "Just" Nuclear Deterrence: Time for a New Strategy to Protect Humanity from Existential Nuclear Risk. Issue 1 (2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Rohlfing, Joan
• Is Part Of: Ethics & international affairs. Volume 37:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: 39
• Page End: 49
• Publication Date: 2023
• Subjects: nuclear -- nuclear weapons -- nuclear deterrence -- nuclear ethics -- just deterrence -- existential threat -- nuclear security -- Joe Nye; International relations -- Moral and ethical aspects -- Periodicals; 172.405
• DOI: 10.1017/S0892679423000023
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0892-6794

Abstract

Abstract: Nuclear weapons are different from every other type of weapons technology. Their awesome destructive potential and the unparalleled consequences of their use oblige us to think critically about the ethics of nuclear possession, planning, and use. Joe Nye has given the ethics of nuclear weapons deep consideration. He posits that we have a basic moral obligation to future generations to preserve roughly equal access to important values, including equal chances of survival, and proposes criteria for achieving conditional or "just deterrence" to minimize the risk of nuclear use and help preserve these values. While Nye's conditions are laudable, they are not achievable. They rely on flawed assumptions about the nature of nuclear weapons and the inherent risks of the nuclear deterrence system. Since the Cold War ended, the strategy and practice of nuclear deterrence has grown riskier, more urgent, more dangerous, and less stable. It is time to rethink how we manage nuclear risks. A new nuclear security system must be built on the design principle that the consequences of system failure cannot threaten to end or fundamentally disrupt civilization. We owe the future a new nuclear security strategy that can prevent an existential global nuclear event.