Neo‐aortic posterior sinus of Valsalva reduction and closed coronary artery transfer as a method to approach aortopulmonary mismatch in transposition of great arteries. Issue 10 (26th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Arcieri, Luigi; Brambilla, Alice; Ravaglioli, Antonio; Viacava, Cecilia; Federici, Duccio; Poli, Vincenzo; Pak, Vitali; Murzi, Bruno
• Is Part Of: Journal of cardiac surgery. Volume 36:Issue 10(2021)
• Page Start: 3665
• Page End: 3670
• Publication Date: 2021-07-26
• Subjects: aortopulmonary mismatch -- arterial switch operation -- neo‐aortic insufficiency -- transpostion of great arteries; Heart -- Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.412005
• DOI: 10.1111/jocs.15820
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0886-0440

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: In transposition of great arteries (TGA), aortopulmonary mismatch (APM) can determine postoperative neo‐aortic insufficiency after arterial switch operation (ASO). The distortion of sinu‐tubular junction may be the geometric mechanism responsible. We developed a strategy able to reduce the mismatch at the timing of ASO, and in this study, we aimed to describe our indications and results. Methods: Preoperative root circumferences at the level of the mid‐portion of sinus of Valsalva and ascending aorta circumference were used to define APM. Indication to surgery was a neo‐aortic root (NAR) to ascending aorta ratio ≥ 1.4. Along with standard ASO, posterior neo‐aortic sinus inverted conal resection and punch technique for coronary reimplantation was used in all patients to re‐establish the more geometric ratio possible between the two components. Hypoplastic aortic arch (HAA) and aortic coarctation (CA) were managed by aortic arch enlargement with an autologous pericardial patch. Results: Twenty patients (20 male), 19 with diagnoses TGA (17 with ventricular septal defect, 85%) and 1 with Taussig–Bing anomaly underwent ASO. HAA was present in three (15%) and CA in two (10%). The mean preoperative neo‐aortic to ascending aorta ratio was 1.8 versus 1.1 postoperatively ( p < .01). No moderate or severe neo‐aortic insufficiency was observed before discharge and at a mean follow‐up of 4.3 years (interquartile range = 0.5–12 years). Conclusion: Neo‐aortic reduction plasty with coronary reimplantation by punch technique is an effective strategy to approach preoperative APM in TGA. This technique confers a more harmonious geometry to NAR that can improve neo‐aortic valve function.