A quantitative study of the influence of cement matrix impregnation on yarn pullout strength using combined confocal microscopy and double resin impregnation. (9th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Slama, Anne‐Claire; Agniel, Rémy; Gallias, Jean‐Louis; Fiorio, Bruno
• Is Part Of: Journal of microscopy. Volume 286:Part 2(2022)
• Page Start: 134
• Page End: 140
• Publication Date: 2022-02-09
• Subjects: cementitious matrix -- composite -- confocal microscopy -- impregnation -- multifilament yarn -- pullout; Microscopy -- Periodicals; 502.82
• DOI: 10.1111/jmi.13086
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0022-2720

Abstract

Abstract: The complex impregnation of a multifilament yarn by a cementitious matrix leads to a difficult prediction of the mechanical behaviour of textile reinforced concrete and its less spread use than steel‐reinforced concrete. To solve this problem, several models were established but they are not based on direct observations of the embedded yarn or quantification of its impregnation. In order to improve those models, a double resin impregnation process followed by confocal microscopy was set up, after pullout test was performed on each sample. Several parameters were then computed from the obtained images, which enables to quantify the impregnation of the yarn for each sample and to compare it with the pullout mechanical results. The number of fully impregnated filaments is found to be the crucial point to explain the pullout maximum load. The type of failure is also defined using those same parameters, computed along the embedded length, and it was found that the shape of the extracted volume of yarn is cylindrical and so the failure of the filaments is not telescopic. A pre‐existing model was then improved, considering all those conclusions obtained by microscopic observations, and a good match between the numerical and the experimental results was found. Multifilament yarns are a continuous and flexible textile structure composed of hundreds of filaments that are maintain together using a chemical product called sizing. Those multifilament yarns can be used to reinforce mortar or concrete, like steel in steel‐reinforced concrete. The performances of those types of composites depend strongly on the strength of the reinforcement/mortar bond. In case of textile /mortar composite, this bond depends on the level of penetration of the mortar into the yarn, so the impregnation of the yarn by the mortar. Since they are both very heterogeneous material, this impregnation is random and incomplete. Consequently, it is very difficult to predict the strength of this bond and so, the strength of the yarn/mortar composite. As a result, this type of composite cannot be widely used. Some models were established to predict the strength of those composite; however, they are not based on direct observation of the textile/mortar bond. To improve those models, a new visualisation method of the impregnation of the yarn by the mortar was set up. A double moulding of the impregnated yarn by the mortar was manufactured, using resins and two different fluorescent dyes, after underwent a mechanical test of pulling out the yarn from the mortar (pullout test). First, a resin with a red fluorescent dye was used for the moulding of the yarn shortly after the test, and, second, after dissolution of the mortar around the yarn in acid, a resin with a green fluorescent dye. A number of cross sections of the yarn is observed using a microscope that detects those two dyes and the obtained images are analysed allowing a clear differentiation, location and counting of fully impregnated filaments of the yarn by the mortar and those partially or not impregnated. The results are compared to the mechanical parameters of the pullout test. The number of fully impregnated filaments is found to be crucial to explain the strength of the composite. The behaviour during the pullout test is also explained using parameters computed along the length of the yarn in the mortar. It is found that filaments extracted by pulling‐out take a cylindrical shape and so the pullout behaviour is not conical shape as it was suggested in a number of models. Considering all those conclusions obtained by observations, a pre‐existing model is improved, and a good match between the numerical and experimental results is found.