198. Clinical Prediction of Bacteremia and the Need for Early Antibiotic Therapy in Solid Tumor Cancer Patients. (31st December 2020)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hyak, Jonathan M; Mohajer, Mayar Al; Musher, Daniel; Musher, Benjamin
• Is Part Of: Open forum infectious diseases. Volume 7:Number 1(2020) Supplement
• Page Start: S103
• Page End: S104
• Publication Date: 2020-12-31
• Subjects: Communicable diseases -- Periodicals; Medical microbiology -- Periodicals; Infection -- Periodicals; 616.9
• DOI: 10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.242
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2328-8957

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Cancer patients (pts) frequently receive empiric antibiotics without clear indication. This retrospective study investigated the relationship between the systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS), early antibiotic (Anb) use, and bacteremia in solid tumor pts presenting to the emergency department (ED). Methods: We extracted data from the electronic medical records of adults with solid tumors admitted to a tertiary care hospital through the ED for any reason over a 2 year period. Pts with neutropenic fever, organ transplant, trauma, or cardiopulmonary arrest were excluded. Rates of SIRS and bacteremia among pts receiving early Anb (eAnb, within 8 hours of admission) were compared to all others using χ 2 . Binomial regression and receiver operator curves assessed predictors of bacteremia. Results: Of 3580 eligible pts, 1344 pts were SIRS positive (≥ 2 criteria) and 2236 were SIRS negative; 501 (37%) and 493 (22%), respectively, received eAnb (p< 0.001). eAnb use increased with additional SIRS criteria (Fig 1). Of SIRS positive pts, 860 (64%) had BCs drawn within 48 hrs of presentation, of which 19% were positive. Of SIRS negative pts, 826 (37%) had cultures drawn within 48 hrs of presentation, of which 14% were positive (19% vs 14%, p=0.004). Of pts who had BCs drawn, the proportion of positive BCs among those who received eAnb and those who did not was identical (16% in each group; p=1). Of 276 pts ultimately proven to have bacteremia within 48 hrs, only 59% were SIRS positive, and only 49% received eAnb in the ED. By regression, only two SIRS components predicted bacteremia, fever (OR 1.8 ± 0.39, p=0.01) and tachycardia (1.4 ± 0.22, p=0.03), and SIRS criteria as a whole were poorly predictive of bacteremia (AUC 0.57, Table 1). A more robust model, which included additional labs and vital signs, was only marginally better (AUC 0.61, Table 2). Figure 1: Proportion of patients receiving early antibiotics by SIRS score Table 1: SIRS as a predictor of bacteremia Table 2: Best predictive model of bacteremia Conclusion: Clinicians still use SIRS criteria to determine the need for eAnb. However, SIRS criteria are poor predictors of bacteremia in solid tumor pts, who frequently manifest them due to complications of cancer or cancer-directed therapy rather than infection. Furthermore, patients who are SIRS negative may be bacteremic. More reliable models are needed to guide judicious use of Anb in the solid tumor population. Disclosures: All Authors : No reported disclosures