Optimal energy allocation trade‐off driven by size‐dependent physiological and demographic responses to warming. Issue 4 (1st February 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Thunell, Viktor; Gårdmark, Anna; Huss, Magnus; Vindenes, Yngvild
• Is Part Of: Ecology. Volume 104:Issue 4(2023)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2023-02-01
• Subjects: adaptation -- body growth -- climate change -- DEB–IPM -- fish -- reproductive investment -- size structure -- temperature‐size rule -- trade‐off; Ecology -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; Écologie -- Périodiques; Ecologie; Écologie; Écologie animale; Écologie végétale; Ecology; Periodicals; 577.05
• DOI: 10.1002/ecy.3967
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0012-9658

Abstract

Abstract: Body size–dependent physiological effects of temperature influence individual growth, reproduction, and survival, which govern animal population responses to global warming. Considerable knowledge has been established on how such effects can affect population growth and size structure, but less is known of their potential role in temperature‐driven adaptation in life‐history traits. In this study, we ask how warming affects the optimal allocation of energy between growth and reproduction and disentangle the underlying fitness trade‐offs. To this end, we develop a novel dynamic energy budget integral projection model (DEB–IPM), linking individuals' size‐ and temperature‐dependent consumption and maintenance via somatic growth, reproduction, and size‐dependent energy allocation to emergent population responses. At the population level, we calculate the long‐term population growth rate (fitness) and stable size structure emerging from demographic processes. Applying the model to an example of pike ( Esox lucius ), we find that optimal energy allocation to growth decreases with warming. Furthermore, we demonstrate how growth, fecundity, and survival contribute to this change in optimal allocation. Higher energy allocation to somatic growth at low temperatures increases fitness through survival of small individuals and through the reproduction of larger individuals. In contrast, at high temperatures, increased allocation to reproduction is favored because warming induces faster somatic growth of small individuals and increased fecundity but reduced growth and higher mortality of larger individuals. Reduced optimum allocation to growth leads to further reductions in body size and an increasingly truncated population size structure with warming. Our study demonstrates how, by incorporating general physiological mechanisms driving the temperature dependence of life‐history traits, the DEB–IPM framework is useful for investigating the adaptation of size‐structured organisms to warming.