Sex‐related differences in reading achievement. Issue 5 (9th July 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Granocchio, Elisa; De Salvatore, Marinella; Bonanomi, Elisa; Sarti, Daniela
• Other Names: Riva Daria guestEditor.; Bulgheroni Sara guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: Journal of neuroscience research. Volume 101:Issue 5(2023)
• Page Start: 668
• Page End: 678
• Publication Date: 2021-07-09
• Subjects: dyslexia -- sex‐differences -- sex‐reading achievement; Neurobiology -- Periodicals; 612
• DOI: 10.1002/jnr.24913
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0360-4012

Abstract

Abstract: Over the last 40 years, ever‐growing interest in sex‐related differences in the human brain has led to a vast amount of literature on the subject, a small part of which relates to studies of differences in the ability to read. The data concerning typically developing children mainly come from school‐based screening projects (Programme for International Student Assessment, INVALSI) and partially from the standardization of reading tests. These have revealed the existence of a gap in favor of females that primarily appears during adolescence and in situations of sociocultural disadvantage, usually explained on the basis of environmental factors such as socioeconomic status and gender‐based education. Dyslexia is a neurodevelopmental disorder that is significantly more prevalent among males, a difference that neuroimaging and genetic studies have attributed to the presence of hormone‐related protective factors in females, although it has been hypothesized that a different neurocognitive substrate may also be involved. However, the literature on the subject is still limited, and further studies of the interactions between genetic risk, environmental factors, and brain phenotypes are needed to clarify why females are better at performing reading tasks and less susceptible to dyslexia, regardless of their language or the educational system in the country in which they live. The aim of this mini‐review was to describe the studies that have investigated sex‐related differences in reading ability in both typically and atypically developing subjects.