Guidelines for the Management of Adult Acute and Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure in the ICU: Neurology, Peri-Transplant Medicine, Infectious Disease, and Gastroenterology Considerations. Issue 5 (13th April 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nanchal, Rahul; Subramanian, Ram; Alhazzani, Waleed; Dionne, Joanna C.; Peppard, William J.; Singbartl, Kai; Truwit, Jonathon; Al-Khafaji, Ali H.; Killian, Alley J.; Alquraini, Mustafa; Alshammari, Khalil; Alshamsi, Fayez; Belley-Cote, Emilie; Cartin-Ceba, Rodrigo; Hollenberg, Steven M.; Galusca, Dragos M.; Huang, David T.; Hyzy, Robert C.; Junek, Mats; Kandiah, Prem; Kumar, Gagan; Morgan, Rebecca L.; Morris, Peter E.; Olson, Jody C.; Sieracki, Rita; Steadman, Randolph; Taylor, Beth; Karvellas, Constantine J.
• Is Part Of: Critical care medicine. Volume 51:Issue 5(2023)
• Page Start: 657
• Page End: 676
• Publication Date: 2023-04-13
• Subjects: acute liver failure -- acute on chronic liver failure -- clinical practice guidelines -- Grading of Recommendations Assessment -- Development, and Evaluation; Critical care medicine -- Periodicals; Soins intensifs -- Périodiques; 616.028
• DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005824
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0090-3493

Abstract

Abstract : OBJECTIVES: To develop evidence-based recommendations for clinicians caring for adults with acute liver failure (ALF) or acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) in the ICU. DESIGN: The guideline panel comprised 27 members with expertise in aspects of care of the critically ill patient with liver failure or methodology. We adhered to the Society of Critical Care Medicine standard operating procedures manual and conflict-of-interest policy. Teleconferences and electronic-based discussion among the panel, as well as within subgroups, served as an integral part of the guideline development. INTERVENTIONS: In part 2 of this guideline, the panel was divided into four subgroups: neurology, peri-transplant, infectious diseases, and gastrointestinal groups. We developed and selected Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcomes (PICO) questions according to importance to patients and practicing clinicians. For each PICO question, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis where applicable. The quality of evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach. We used the evidence to decision framework to facilitate recommendations formulation as strong or conditional. We followed strict criteria to formulate best practice statements. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We report 28 recommendations (from 31 PICO questions) on the management ALF and ACLF in the ICU. Overall, five were strong recommendations, 21 were conditional recommendations, two were best-practice statements, and we were unable to issue a recommendation for five questions due to insufficient evidence. CONCLUSIONS: Multidisciplinary, international experts formulated evidence-based recommendations for the management ALF and ACLF patients in the ICU, acknowledging that most recommendations were based on low quality and indirect evidence.