Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracies of Monocyte Distribution Width, Procalcitonin, and C-Reactive Protein for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Issue 5 (6th March 2023)
- Record Type:
- Journal Article
- Title:
- Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracies of Monocyte Distribution Width, Procalcitonin, and C-Reactive Protein for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Issue 5 (6th March 2023)
- Main Title:
- Comparison of the Diagnostic Accuracies of Monocyte Distribution Width, Procalcitonin, and C-Reactive Protein for Sepsis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
- Authors:
- Huang, Yu-Hsuan
Chen, Ching-Jung
Shao, Shih-Chieh
Li, Chih‑Huang
Hsiao, Chien-Han
Niu, Kuang-Yu
Yen, Chieh-Ching - Abstract:
- Abstract : OBJECTIVES: We performed a systemic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of monocyte distribution width (MDW) and to compare with procalcitonin and C‐reactive protein (CRP), in adult patients with sepsis. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify all relevant diagnostic accuracy studies published before October 1, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Original articles reporting the diagnostic accuracy of MDW for sepsis detection with the Sepsis-2 or Sepsis-3 criteria were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Study data were abstracted by two independent reviewers using a standardized data extraction form. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eighteen studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MDW were 84% (95% CI [79–88%]) and 68% (95% CI [60–75%]). The estimated diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) were 11.11 (95% CI [7.36–16.77]) and 0.85 (95% CI [0.81–0.89]). Significant heterogeneity was observed among the included studies. Eight studies compared the diagnostic accuracies of MDW and procalcitonin, and five studies compared the diagnostic accuracies of MDW and CRP. For MDW versus procalcitonin, the area under the SROC was similar (0.88, CI = 0.84–0.93 vs 0.82, CI = 0.76–0.88). For MDW versus CRP, the area under the SROC was similar (0.88, CI = 0.83–0.93 vs 0.86, CI = 0.78–0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The results ofAbstract : OBJECTIVES: We performed a systemic review and meta‐analysis to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of monocyte distribution width (MDW) and to compare with procalcitonin and C‐reactive protein (CRP), in adult patients with sepsis. DATA SOURCES: A systematic literature search was performed in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to identify all relevant diagnostic accuracy studies published before October 1, 2022. STUDY SELECTION: Original articles reporting the diagnostic accuracy of MDW for sepsis detection with the Sepsis-2 or Sepsis-3 criteria were included. DATA EXTRACTION: Study data were abstracted by two independent reviewers using a standardized data extraction form. DATA SYNTHESIS: Eighteen studies were included in the meta‐analysis. The pooled sensitivity and specificity of MDW were 84% (95% CI [79–88%]) and 68% (95% CI [60–75%]). The estimated diagnostic odds ratio and the area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve (SROC) were 11.11 (95% CI [7.36–16.77]) and 0.85 (95% CI [0.81–0.89]). Significant heterogeneity was observed among the included studies. Eight studies compared the diagnostic accuracies of MDW and procalcitonin, and five studies compared the diagnostic accuracies of MDW and CRP. For MDW versus procalcitonin, the area under the SROC was similar (0.88, CI = 0.84–0.93 vs 0.82, CI = 0.76–0.88). For MDW versus CRP, the area under the SROC was similar (0.88, CI = 0.83–0.93 vs 0.86, CI = 0.78–0.95). CONCLUSIONS: The results of the meta-analysis indicate that MDW is a reliable diagnostic biomarker for sepsis as procalcitonin and CRP. Further studies investigating the combination of MDW and other biomarkers are advisable to increase the accuracy in sepsis detection. … (more)
- Is Part Of:
- Critical care medicine. Volume 51:Issue 5(2023)
- Journal:
- Critical care medicine
- Issue:
- Volume 51:Issue 5(2023)
- Issue Display:
- Volume 51, Issue 5 (2023)
- Year:
- 2023
- Volume:
- 51
- Issue:
- 5
- Issue Sort Value:
- 2023-0051-0005-0000
- Page Start:
- e106
- Page End:
- e114
- Publication Date:
- 2023-03-06
- Subjects:
- biomarker -- meta-analysis -- monocyte distribution width -- sepsis
Critical care medicine -- Periodicals
Soins intensifs -- Périodiques
616.028 - Journal URLs:
- http://journals.lww.com/ccmjournal/Pages/default.aspx ↗
http://journals.lww.com ↗ - DOI:
- 10.1097/CCM.0000000000005820 ↗
- Languages:
- English
- ISSNs:
- 0090-3493
- Deposit Type:
- Legaldeposit
- View Content:
- Available online (eLD content is only available in our Reading Rooms) ↗
- Physical Locations:
- British Library DSC - 3487.451000
British Library DSC - BLDSS-3PM
British Library STI - ELD Digital store - Ingest File:
- 26924.xml