A New Experimental Approach for Hydraulic Fracturing Fluid Damage of Ultradeep Tight Gas Formation. (25th February 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Hui; Liu, Zhiliang; Jia, Ninghong; Chen, Xu; Yang, Jing; Cao, Lele; Li, Ben
• Other Names: Wu Zhongwei Academic Editor.
• Is Part Of: Geofluids. Volume 2021(2021)
• Publication Date: 2021-02-25
• Subjects: Hydrogeology -- Periodicals; Sedimentary basins -- Periodicals; Fluids -- Migration -- Periodicals; Groundwater flow -- Periodicals; Geothermal resources -- Periodicals; Fluid dynamics -- Periodicals; Earth -- Crust -- Periodicals; 551.49
• DOI: 10.1155/2021/6616645
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1468-8115

Abstract

Abstract : The unconventional resources from an ultradeep tight gas reservoir have received significant attention in recent decades. Hydraulic fracturing is the main method for tight gas reservoir development because of its extremely low permeability and porosity. During hydraulic fracturing, high hydraulic fracturing fluid (HFF) that invaded the zone near the fracture face may reduce gas relative permeability significantly and impede gas production. The sources of this damage can be the high capillary pressure (HCP) and the presence of water-sensitive clays (PWC). For tight rock, it is usually infeasible to identify the primary damage mechanism using the traditional steady-state measurement method due to long measurement time and gauge accuracy. In this paper, we present a new experimental approach to identify the primary mechanism of the fracture face damage (FFD) through the application of the pressure transmission method and pressure decay method. Both rock matrix and naturally fractured tight samples (depth 18, 000 ft, Tarim field, China) were tested. The experimental results showed that the average high capillary pressure damage indexes (D HCP ) of rock matrix cores and naturally fractured cores are 94.9% and 92.4%, respectively, indicating severe damage caused by HCP. The average clay-swelling and mobilization (CSM) damage indexes (D CSM ) of rock matrix cores and naturally fractured cores are 29.6% and 38.4%, respectively, indicating that the damage caused by CSM is lighter than that by HCP. HCP is the primary damage mechanism for the tight sandstone. And the damage degree of the rock matrix cores is higher than that of the naturally fractured core. The proposed procedures can be applied to identify the FFD mechanism of other tight and shale formation and provide insightful fundamental data for HFF optimization.