Validation of appendiceal stump invagination in laparoscopic appendectomy. Issue 2 (27th October 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Bekki, Tomoaki; Abe, Tomoyuki; Namba, Yosuke; Okimoto, Sho; Mukai, Shoichiro; Saito, Yasufumi; Oishi, Koichi; Fujisaki, Seiji; Ohdan, Hideki; Fukuda, Toshikatsu
• Is Part Of: Asian journal of endoscopic surgery. Volume 16:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: 203
• Page End: 209
• Publication Date: 2022-10-27
• Subjects: acute appendicitis -- appendiceal stump invagination -- laparoscopic appendectomy; Endoscopic surgery -- Periodicals; Endoscopic surgery -- Asia -- Periodicals; 617.05705
• DOI: 10.1111/ases.13137
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1758-5902

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: There are various methods for appendiceal stump dissection, but the necessity for stump invagination remains unclear. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of appendiceal stump invagination in patients with acute appendicitis after laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). Methods: We enrolled 327 patients with acute appendicitis who underwent LA between 2012 and 2020. Perioperative variables and surgical outcomes were analyzed between the invagination of the appendiceal stump and noninvagination groups. Propensity score‐matched analysis (PSM) was performed. Results: More patients experienced severe inflammation and severe intra‐abdominal contamination in the noninvagination group than in the invagination group. Patients in the noninvagination group had an older age, higher body mass index, and poorer American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status than the invagination group. Severe inflammation in the noninvagination group was associated with longer hospital stays and poorer postoperative complications than in the invagination group. PSM analysis was performed to minimize bias in the two groups. After PSM analysis, there were no significant differences in surgical site infection, postoperative intra‐abdominal abscess, Clavien–Dindo class ≥IIIa, or postoperative stay between the two groups. During the follow‐up period, the postoperative adhesive ileus was not significantly different between the invagination and noninvagination groups. Conclusion: Invagination of the appendiceal stump during LA is not necessary to prevent short‐ and long‐term complications. Even in cases dissected using a laparoscopic endostapler, the appendiceal stump per se is not related to postoperative adhesive ileus.