Coping profiles and differences in well‐being during the COVID‐19 pandemic: A latent profile analysis. (16th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Kenntemich, Laura; von Hülsen, Leonie; Schäfer, Ingo; Böttche, Maria; Lotzin, Annett
• Is Part Of: Stress and health. Volume 39:Number 2(2023)
• Page Start: 460
• Page End: 473
• Publication Date: 2022-09-16
• Subjects: coping profiles -- coronavirus -- COVID‐19 -- disaster -- mental health -- pandemic -- well‐being; Medicine and psychology -- Periodicals; Stress (Physiology) -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Stress -- Periodicals; Health -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Periodicals; Stress, Psychological -- Periodicals; Médecine et psychologie -- Périodiques; Stress -- Périodiques; Médecine -- Périodiques; 616.98
• DOI: 10.1002/smi.3196
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1532-3005

Abstract

Abstract: During the current COVID‐19 pandemic, people need to cope with multiple stressors which may affect their well‐being. This study aimed (1) to identify latent coping profiles in the German general population, and (2) to investigate differences between these profiles in well‐being. In total, N = 2326 German participants were recruited as part of the European Society of Traumatic Stress Studies (ESTSS) ADJUST study from June to September 2020 using an online survey. Coping strategies were assessed using the Brief‐COPE and the Pandemic Coping Scale; well‐being was assessed using the WHO‐5 Well‐Being Index. Coping profiles were identified using latent profile analysis; differences between profiles were examined using the automatic BCH method and multiple group analyses. Five coping profiles were identified that included different types and numbers of coping strategies: (1) High functional coping (17.84%), (2) Moderate functional coping (40.63%), (3) High functional and religious coping (9.07%), (4) Low functional coping (22.06%), (5) Moderate functional and dysfunctional coping (10.40%). The identified profiles significantly differed in well‐being ( χ 2 = 503.68, p <0.001). Coping profiles indicating high functional coping were associated with greater well‐being compared to coping profiles indicating low ( χ 2 = 82.21, p <0.001) or primarily dysfunctional ( χ 2 = 354.33, p <0.001) coping. These results provide insight into how people differ in their coping strategies when dealing with stressors in an early phase of the COVID‐19 pandemic. The study indicates higher levels of well‐being in coping profiles with more frequent use of functional strategies. To promote well‐being in the general population, it might be beneficial to train functional coping strategies in appropriate interventions that are associated with increased well‐being.