A method for measuring B0 field inhomogeneity using quantitative double‐echo in steady‐state. Issue 2 (25th September 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Barbieri, Marco; Chaudhari, Akshay S.; Moran, Catherine J.; Gold, Garry E.; Hargreaves, Brian A.; Kogan, Feliks
• Is Part Of: Magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 89:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: 577
• Page End: 593
• Publication Date: 2022-09-25
• Subjects: B0$$ {B}_0 $$ mapping -- bilateral knee imaging -- qDESS -- qMRI; Nuclear magnetic resonance -- Periodicals; Electron paramagnetic resonance -- Periodicals; 616.07548
• DOI: 10.1002/mrm.29465
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0740-3194

Abstract

Abstract : Purpose: To develop and validate a method for B 0 $$ {B}_0 $$ mapping for knee imaging using the quantitative Double‐Echo in Steady‐State (qDESS) exploiting the phase difference ( Δ θ $$ \Delta \theta $$ ) between the two echoes acquired. Contrary to a two‐gradient‐echo (2‐GRE) method, Δ θ $$ \Delta \theta $$ depends only on the first echo time. Methods: Bloch simulations were applied to investigate robustness to noise of the proposed methodology and all imaging studies were validated with phantoms and in vivo simultaneous bilateral knee acquisitions. Two phantoms and five healthy subjects were scanned using qDESS, water saturation shift referencing (WASSR), and multi‐GRE sequences. Δ B 0 $$ \Delta {B}_0 $$ maps were calculated with the qDESS and the 2‐GRE methods and compared against those obtained with WASSR. The comparison was quantitatively assessed exploiting pixel‐wise difference maps, Bland–Altman (BA) analysis, and Lin's concordance coefficient ( ρ c $$ {\rho}_c $$ ). For in vivo subjects, the comparison was assessed in cartilage using average values in six subregions. Results: The proposed method for measuring Δ B 0 $$ \Delta {B}_0 $$ inhomogeneities from a qDESS acquisition provided Δ B 0 $$ \Delta {B}_0 $$ maps that were in good agreement with those obtained using WASSR. Δ B 0 $$ \Delta {B}_0 $$ ρ c $$ {\rho}_c $$ values were ≥ $$ \ge $$ 0.98 and 0.90 in phantoms and in vivo, respectively. The agreement between qDESS and WASSR was comparable to that of a 2‐GRE method. Conclusion: The proposed method may allow B0 correction for qDESS T 2 $$ {T}_2 $$ mapping using an inherently co‐registered Δ B 0 $$ \Delta {B}_0 $$ map without requiring an additional B0 measurement sequence. More generally, the method may help shorten knee imaging protocols that require an auxiliary Δ B 0 $$ \Delta {B}_0 $$ map by exploiting a qDESS acquisition that also provides T 2 $$ {T}_2 $$ measurements and high‐quality morphological imaging. Abstract : Click here for author‐reader discussions