Respiratory function in uncomplicated type 1 diabetes: Blunted during exercise even though normal at rest!. Issue 5 (10th January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jlali, Islem; Heyman, Elsa; Matran, Régis; Marais, Gaelle; Descatoire, Aurélien; Rabasa‐Lhoret, Rémi; Touil, Imen; Pawlak‐Chaouch, Mehdi; Mucci, Patrick; Fontaine, Pierre; Baquet, Georges; Tagougui, Sémah
• Is Part Of: Diabetic medicine. Volume 40:Issue 5(2023)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2023-01-10
• Subjects: diffusion capacity -- maximal exercise -- micro–macrovascular complication -- pulmonary function -- spirometry -- type 1 diabetes -- ventilatory response; Diabetes -- Periodicals; 616.462
• DOI: 10.1111/dme.15036
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0742-3071

Abstract

Abstract: Aims: Type 1 diabetes is associated with a substantially increased risk of impaired lung function, which may impair aerobic fitness. We therefore aimed to examine the ventilatory response during maximal exercise and the pulmonary diffusion capacity function at rest in individuals with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes. Methods: In all, 17 adults with type 1 diabetes free from micro–macrovascular complications (glycated haemoglobin: 8.0 ± 1.3%), and 17 non‐diabetic adults, carefully matched to the type 1 diabetes group according to gender, age, level of physical activity and body composition, participated in our study. Lung function was assessed by spirometry and measurements of the combined diffusing capacity for nitric oxide (DLNO) and carbon monoxide (DLCO) at rest. Subjects performed a maximal exercise test during which the respiratory parameters were measured. Results: At rest, DLCO (30.4 ± 6.1 ml min −1 mmHg −1 vs. 31.4 ± 5.7 ml min −1 mmHg −1, respectively, p = 0.2), its determinants Dm (membrane diffusion capacity) and Vc (pulmonary capillary volume) were comparable among type 1 diabetes and control groups, respectively. Nevertheless, spirometry parameters (forced vital capacity = 4.9 ± 1.0 L vs. 5.5 ± 1.0 L, p < 0.05; forced expiratory volume 1 = 4.0 ± 0.7 L vs. 4.3 ± 0.7 L, p < 0.05) were lower in individuals with type 1 diabetes, although in the predicted normal range. During exercise, ventilatory response to exercise was different between the two groups: tidal volume was lower in type 1 diabetes vs. individuals without diabetes ( p < 0.05). Type 1 diabetes showed a reduced VO2max (34.7 ± 6.8 vs. 37.9 ± 6.3, respectively, p = 0.04) in comparison to healthy subjects. Conclusions: Individuals with uncomplicated type 1 diabetes display normal alveolar‐capillary diffusion capacity and at rest, while their forced vital capacity, tidal volumes and VO2 are reduced during maximal exercise. Abstract :