Thoracic CTA in infants and young children: Image quality of dual‐source CT (DSCT) with high‐pitch spiral scan mode (turbo flash spiral mode) with or without general anesthesia with free‐breathing technique. Issue 8 (20th May 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Tivnan, Patrick; Winant, Abbey J.; Johnston, Patrick R.; Plut, Domen; Smith, Katherine; MacCallum, Gail; Lee, Edward Y.
• Is Part Of: Pediatric pulmonology. Volume 56:Issue 8(2021)
• Page Start: 2660
• Page End: 2667
• Publication Date: 2021-05-20
• Subjects: chest -- children -- computed tomography angiography (CTA) -- dual‐source computed tomography (DSCT) -- infants -- motion -- motion artifact -- sedation -- turbo flash spiral mode (TFSM) -- young children; Pediatric respiratory diseases -- Periodicals; Pediatrics -- Periodicals; 618.922
• DOI: 10.1002/ppul.25446
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 8755-6863

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: To determine whether diagnostic quality thoracic computed tomography angiography (CTA) studies can be obtained without general anesthesia (GA) in infants and young children using dual‐source computed tomography (DSCT) with turbo flash spiral mode (TFSM) and free‐breathing technique. Materials and Methods: All consecutive infants and young children (≤ 6 years old) who underwent thoracic CTA studies from January 2018 to October 2020 for suspected congenital thoracic disorders were categorized into two groups: with GA (Group 1) and without GA (Group 2). All thoracic CTA studies were performed on a DSCT scanner using TFSM and free‐breathing technique. Two pediatric thoracic radiologists independently evaluated motion artifact in three lung zones (upper, mid, and lower). Degree of motion artifact was graded 0–3 (0, none; 1, mild; 2, moderate; and 3, severe). Logistic models adjusted for age and gender were used to compare the degree of motion artifact between lung zones. Interobserver agreement between reviewers was evaluated with kappa statistics. Results: There were a total of 73 pediatric patients (43 males (59%) and 30 females (41%); mean age, 1.4 years; range, 0–5.9 years). Among these 73 patients, 42 patients (58%) underwent thoracic CTA studies with GA (Group 1) and the remaining 31 patients (42%) underwent thoracic CTA studies without GA (Group 2). Overall, the degree of motion artifact was higher for Group 2 (without GA). However, only a very small minority (1/31, 3%) of Group 2 (without GA) thoracic CTA studies had severe motion artifact. There was no significant difference between the two groups with respect to the presence of severe motion artifact (odds ratio [OR] = 6, p = .222). When two groups were compared with respect to the presence of motion artifact for individual lung zones, motion artifact was significantly higher in the upper lung zone for Group 2 (without GA) (OR = 20, p = .043). Interobserver agreement for motion artifact was high, the average Kappa being 0.81 for Group 1 and 0.95 for Group 2. Conclusion: Although the degree of motion artifact was higher in the group without GA, only a small minority (3%) of thoracic CTA studies performed without GA had severe motion artifact, rendering the study nondiagnostic. Therefore, the results of this study support the use of thoracic CTA without GA using DSCT with TFSM and free‐breathing in infants and young children. In addition, given that motion artifact was significantly higher in the upper lung zone without GA, increased stabilization in the upper chest and extremities should be considered.