Causal Judgment in the Wild: Evidence from the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. Issue 2 (5th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Quillien, Tadeg; Barlev, Michael
• Is Part Of: Cognitive science. Volume 46:Issue 2(2022)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2022-02-05
• Subjects: Causality -- Causal judgment -- Causal selection -- Counterfactuals -- Computational modeling; Cognition -- Periodicals; Psycholinguistics -- Periodicals; Artificial intelligence -- Periodicals; 153.05
• DOI: 10.1111/cogs.13101
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0364-0213

Abstract

Abstract: When explaining why an event occurred, people intuitively highlight some causes while ignoring others. How do people decide which causes to select? Models of causal judgment have been evaluated in simple and controlled laboratory experiments, but they have yet to be tested in a complex real‐world setting. Here, we provide such a test, in the context of the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Across tens of thousands of simulations of possible election outcomes, we computed, for each state, an adjusted measure of the correlation between a Biden victory in that state and a Biden election victory. These effect size measures accurately predicted the extent to which U.S. participants ( N = 207, preregistered) viewed victory in a given state as having caused Biden to win the presidency. Our findings support the theory that people intuitively select as causes of an outcome the factors with the largest standardized causal effect on that outcome across possible counterfactual worlds.