Development and validation of an interpretable machine learning scoring tool for estimating time to emergency readmissions. (March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Xie, Feng; Liu, Nan; Yan, Linxuan; Ning, Yilin; Lim, Ka Keat; Gong, Changlin; Kwan, Yu Heng; Ho, Andrew Fu Wah; Low, Lian Leng; Chakraborty, Bibhas; Ong, Marcus Eng Hock
• Is Part Of: EClinicalMedicine. Volume 45(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-03
• Subjects: Patient readmission -- Emergency -- Scoring system -- Interpretable machine learning -- AutoScore; Medicine -- Research -- Periodicals; Medical policy -- Periodicals; Clinical Medicine; Health Policy; Public Health; Medical policy; Medicine -- Research; Periodical; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 613
• DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101315
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2589-5370

Abstract

Summary: Background: Emergency readmission poses an additional burden on both patients and healthcare systems. Risk stratification is the first step of transitional care interventions targeted at reducing readmission. To accurately predict the short- and intermediate-term risks of readmission and provide information for further temporal risk stratification, we developed and validated an interpretable machine learning risk scoring system. Methods: In this retrospective study, all emergency admission episodes from January 1st 2009 to December 31st 2016 at a tertiary hospital in Singapore were assessed. The primary outcome was time to emergency readmission within 90 days post discharge. The Score for Emergency ReAdmission Prediction (SERAP) tool was derived via an interpretable machine learning-based system for time-to-event outcomes. SERAP is six-variable survival score, and takes the number of emergency admissions last year, age, history of malignancy, history of renal diseases, serum creatinine level, and serum albumin level during index admission into consideration. Findings: A total of 293, 589 ED admission episodes were finally included in the whole cohort. Among them, 203, 748 episodes were included in the training cohort, 50, 937 episodes in the validation cohort, and 38, 904 in the testing cohort. Readmission within 90 days was documented in 80, 213 (27.3%) episodes, with a median time to emergency readmission of 22 days (Interquartile range: 8-47). For different time points, the readmission rates observed in the whole cohort were 6.7% at 7 days, 10.6% at 14 days, 13.6% at 21 days, 16.4% at 30 days, and 23.0% at 60 days. In the testing cohort, the SERAP achieved an integrated area under the curve of 0.737 (95% confidence interval: 0.730-0.743). For a specific 30-day readmission prediction, SERAP outperformed the LACE index (Length of stay, Acuity of admission, Charlson comorbidity index, and Emergency department visits in past six months) and the HOSPITAL score (Hemoglobin at discharge, discharge from an Oncology service, Sodium level at discharge, Procedure during the index admission, Index Type of admission, number of Admissions during the last 12 months, and Length of stay). Besides 30-day readmission, SERAP can predict readmission rates at any time point during the 90-day period. Interpretation: Better performance in risk prediction was achieved by the SERAP than other existing scores, and accurate information about time to emergency readmission was generated for further temporal risk stratification and clinical decision-making. In the future, external validation studies are needed to evaluate the SERAP at different settings and assess their real-world performance. Funding: This study was supported by the Singapore National Medical Research Council under the PULSES Center Grant, and Duke-NUS Medical School.