P151 Assessing comprehensive remission for Ulcerative Colitis in clinical practice: International consensus recommendations. (30th January 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Schreiber, S W; Danese, S; Dignass, A; Domènech, E; Fantini, M; Ferrante, M; Halfvarson, J; Hart, A; Magro, F; Lees, C; Leone, S; Pierik, M; Field, P; Schofield, H; Peyrin-Biroulet, L
• Is Part Of: Journal of Crohn's and colitis. Volume 17(2023)Supplement 1
• Page Start: i311
• Page End: i312
• Publication Date: 2023-01-30
• Subjects: Inflammatory bowel diseases -- Periodicals; 616.344005
• DOI: 10.1093/ecco-jcc/jjac190.0281
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1873-9946

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Real-world treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC) requires a patient-centric, holistic definition of 'comprehensive remission' that goes beyond standard regulatory definitions. In an international initiative, we reviewed aspects of UC that affect patients and attempted to achieve consensus on which aspects should be considered in a definition of 'comprehensive remission', using a modified Delphi process. This initiative summarized expert consensus recommendations on aspects of UC that are important to patients and that affect their lives, how to measure and score these aspects, and objective markers of mucosal inflammation that are relevant to evaluate in remission, such as endoscopic and histological activity and inflammatory biomarkers. Methods: The Delphi consensus panel comprised 10 physicians with expertise in UC and one patient advocate, and two additional physicians chaired the process. To inform the Delphi statements, we asked 18 patients about their experiences of living with UC in remission, asked panel members about their experience of treating patients and systematically reviewed associations between outcome measures in UC. Panel members voted on a 6-point Likert scale in three rounds of anonymous voting, the final round of which was preceded by a live discussion. Consensus was met if ≥ 67% of the panel agreed with the statement (4–6 on the 6-point Likert scale). Statements not meeting consensus in voting rounds 1 and 2 were revised and any not meeting consensus by the end of voting round 3 were discarded (Figure 1). Results: The panel agreed that a definition of comprehensive remission should include aspects of UC that are currently measured in clinical trials (blood in stools, stool frequency, disease-related quality of life [QoL], endoscopic remission, histological inflammatory activity, inflammatory biomarkers and discontinuation of corticosteroids), but also additional patient-reported symptoms should be added. These were bowel urgency, abdominal pain, extra-intestinal manifestations, fatigue and sleep disturbance (Table 1). Suggestions for how the severity could be measured and thresholds for remission were agreed for each aspect, with the exception of extra-intestinal manifestations. Disease activity evaluated using ultrasound was voted as important to consider but was not recommended to be included in a measure of comprehensive remission at this stage. Conclusion: We used a robust methodology to reach agreement and provide recommendations on the aspects of UC that can be used to define comprehensive remission and assessed in clinical practice. We plan to develop this as a combined measure which may also have applicability in clinical trials.