Feasibility of PURPOSE T in clinical practice and patient participation–A mixed‐method study. Issue 3 (20th July 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Hultin, Lisa; Karlsson, Ann‐Christin; Löwenmark, Malin; Coleman, Susanne; Gunningberg, Lena
• Is Part Of: International wound journal. Volume 20:Issue 3(2023)
• Page Start: 633
• Page End: 647
• Publication Date: 2022-07-20
• Subjects: feasibility -- nurses -- patient participation -- pressure ulcer -- risk assessment; Wounds and injuries -- Treatment -- Periodicals; Wounds and injuries -- Periodicals; Wound healing -- Periodicals; 617.1005
• DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13904
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1742-4801

Abstract

Abstract: This study aimed to evaluate the feasibility of implementing an electronic version of PURPOSE T, a risk assessment instrument for pressure ulcers, in a Swedish hospital ward. A mixed‐method was used. Nursing staff received training in PURPOSE T and a record review was performed (n = 30). PURPOSE T replaced the Modified Norton Scale, and after one month another record review was performed (n = 30). Individual interviews with patients (n = 15) and focus group interviews with nursing staff (n = 23) were performed after the implementation. The results of the record review and the focus group interviews showed good clinical feasibility of PURPOSE T. The record review showed that more patients were at risk of developing pressure ulcers and more nursing interventions were prescribed with PURPOSE T compared to the Modified Norton Scale. The focus group interviews showed that all nursing staff were satisfied with PURPOSE T. The instrument contributed to increased reflection and analysis as well as the opportunity for nursing staff to draw their own conclusions regarding patients´ risk status. The documentation encouraged the prescription of more preventive actions, and the nurses were more involved at bedside. However, almost all the patients expressed not receiving any information about pressure ulcers.