Effectiveness, Implementation, and Policy Diffusion: Or "Can We Make That Work for Us?". (March 2016)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Nicholson-Crotty, Sean; Carley, Sanya
• Editors: Boehmke, Frederick J.; Pacheco, Julianna
• Is Part Of: State politics & policy quarterly. Volume 16:Number 1(2016:Mar.)
• Page Start: 78
• Page End: 97
• Publication Date: 2016-03
• Subjects: public policy -- energy policy -- policy adoption -- renewable portfolio standard -- diffusion -- social learning -- effectiveness -- compliance; State governments -- United States -- Periodicals; Political planning -- United States -- States -- Periodicals; Gouvernements d'États fédérés -- États-Unis -- Périodiques; Politique publique -- États-Unis -- États -- Périodiques; 320.97305
• DOI: 10.1177/1532440015588764
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1532-4400

Abstract

Abstract : Policy learning has been one of the primary mechanisms by which policy innovations are assumed to diffuse from one jurisdiction to another. Recent research suggests, however, that learning is more than simply observing policy adoption in other jurisdictions and must also include an assessment of the outcomes or effectiveness of those policies. This article argues that an assessment of the ability to implement an innovation is also likely to be a component of the learning process. Specifically, it argues that potential adopters are likely to ask not only, "Was the policy effective in other states that adopted it?" but also, "Can we make the policy work for us?" We test hypotheses drawn from this general argument in a directed dyad analysis of renewable portfolio standards in the American states between 1997 and 2009. Results indicate that shared implementation environments among jurisdictions help determine the impact that information about policy effectiveness has on adoption decisions. These findings suggest that implementation concerns may be an important part of the policy learning process.