Public Opinion and Judicial Behavior in Direct Democracy Systems: Gay Rights in the American States. (December 2014)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lewis, Daniel C.; Wood, Frederick S.; Jacobsmeier, Matthew L.
• Is Part Of: State politics & policy quarterly. Volume 14:Number 4(2014:Dec.)
• Page Start: 367
• Page End: 388
• Publication Date: 2014-12
• Subjects: direct democracy -- political behavior -- judicial elections -- judicial politics -- judicial behavior -- politics of sexuality -- identity/group politics -- issue preferences -- public opinion; State governments -- United States -- Periodicals; Political planning -- United States -- States -- Periodicals; Gouvernements d'États fédérés -- États-Unis -- Périodiques; Politique publique -- États-Unis -- États -- Périodiques; 320.97305
• DOI: 10.1177/1532440014550409
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1532-4400

Abstract

Abstract: Although the U.S. judiciary is designed to be an independent and counter-majoritarian arbiter of the law, many states feature electoral institutions that may expose judges to public pressure. Scholars have demonstrated that judicial elections provide a clear link between public opinion and judicial decision making that may undermine the ability of courts to act in counter-majoritarian ways to protect minority rights. We extend this line of inquiry by examining whether direct democracy institutions have a similar effect of enhancing the impact of public opinion on judicial behavior and reducing the likelihood of judges voting in favor of minority rights. Empirical results from an analysis of gay rights cases in the American states from 1981 to 2004 provide evidence that direct democracy, in conjunction with electoral retention methods, significantly increases the effect of public opinion on judicial decisions.