Development and assessment of a low literacy, pictographic asthma action plan with clinical automation to enhance guideline-concordant care for children with asthma. (3rd April 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Reeves, Patrick T.; Kenny, Timothy M.; Mulreany, Laura T.; McCown, Michael Y.; Jacknewitz-Woolard, Jane E.; Rogers, Philip L.; Echelmeyer, Sofia; Welsh, Sebastian K.
• Is Part Of: Journal of asthma. Volume 60:Number 4(2023)
• Page Start: 655
• Page End: 672
• Publication Date: 2023-04-03
• Subjects: Discharge planning -- patient care planning -- patient education handout -- emergency/acute management; Asthma -- Periodicals; 616.238005
• DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2022.2087188
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0277-0903

Abstract

Abstract: Objective: Asthma is characterized by reversible pulmonary symptoms, frequent hospitalizations, poor quality of life, and varied treatment. Parents with low health literacy (HL) is linked to poor asthma outcomes in children. Recent practice updates recommended inhaled corticosteroids for the management of persistent asthma, but guideline-concordant care is suboptimal. Our aim was to develop and assess an Asthma Action Plan (AAP) that could serve as an individualized plan for low HL families and facilitate guideline-concordant care for clinicians. Methods: We followed the National Institute of Health 5-step "Clear & Simple" approach to develop the Uniformed Services AAP. Our AAP included symptom pictographs (dyspnea, cough, sleep, activity) and guideline-concordant clinical automation tools. Caregivers assessed the pictograms for validity (transparency of ≥ 85%; translucency score ≥ 5; and ≥ 85% recall). Readability was assessed using 7 formulas. (<6th Grade was acceptable). Comprehensibility, design quality, and usefulness was assessed by caregivers using the Consumer Information Rating Form (CIRF) (>80% was acceptable). Understandability and actionability was assessed by medical librarians using the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool-Printable (>80% was acceptable). Suitability was assessed by clinicians using the modified Suitability Assessment of Materials (SAM) instrument (>70% was superior). Results: All 12 pictograms were validated ( N = 118 respondents). Readability demonstrated a 4th grade level. Overall CIRF percentile score = 80.4%. Understandability and Actionability = 100%. Suitability score = 75%. Conclusions: Our AAP was formally endorsed by the Allergy & Asthma Network. The Uniformed Services AAP is a novel tool with embedded clinical automation that can address low HL and enhance guideline-concordant care.