Impact of microclimatic conditions and resource availability on spring and autumn phenology of temperate tree seedlings. Issue 2 (16th August 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Vitasse, Yann; Baumgarten, Frederik; Zohner, Constantin M.; Kaewthongrach, Rungnapa; Fu, Yongshuo H.; Walde, Manuel G.; Moser, Barbara
• Is Part Of: New phytologist. Volume 232:Issue 2(2021)
• Page Start: 537
• Page End: 550
• Publication Date: 2021-08-16
• Subjects: bud albedo -- budburst -- drought -- environmental stressors -- leaf senescence -- light -- microclimate -- phenology; Botany -- Periodicals; 580
• DOI: 10.1111/nph.17606
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0028-646X

Abstract

Summary: Microclimatic effects (light, temperature) are often neglected in phenological studies and little information is known about the impact of resource availability (nutrient and water) on tree's phenological cycles. Here we experimentally studied spring and autumn phenology in four temperate trees in response to changes in bud albedo (white‐painted vs black‐painted buds), light conditions (nonshaded vs c . 70% shaded), water availability (irrigated, control and reduced precipitation) and nutrients (low vs high availability). We found that higher bud albedo or shade delayed budburst (up to +12 d), indicating that temperature is sensed locally within each bud. Leaf senescence was delayed by high nutrient availability (up to +7 d) and shade conditions (up to +39 d) in all species, except oak. Autumn phenological responses to summer droughts depended on species, with a delay for cherry (+7 d) and an advance for beech (−7 d). The strong phenological effects of bud albedo and light exposure reveal an important role of microclimatic variation on phenology. In addition to the temperature and photoperiod effects, our results suggest a tight interplay between source and sink processes in regulating the end of the seasonal vegetation cycle, which can be largely influenced by resource availability (light, water and nutrients).