A continuum of genetic mixing for conservation management along the (mal)adaptation spectrum: A comment on Hoffmann et al. (29th January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Crispo, Erika; Derry, Alison M.; Brady, Steven P.
• Is Part Of: Evolutionary applications. Volume 14:Number 5(2021)
• Page Start: 1213
• Page End: 1215
• Publication Date: 2021-01-29
• Subjects: adaptation -- conservation -- evolutionary rescue -- genetic rescue -- genetic variation -- maladaptation; Evolution (Biology) -- Periodicals; Genetics -- Periodicals; Natural selection -- Periodicals; Ecology -- Periodicals; 576.8
• DOI: 10.1111/eva.13196
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1752-4571

Abstract

Abstract: When restoring gene flow for conservation management, genetic variation should be viewed along a continuum of genetic divergence between donor and recipient populations. On the one hand, maintaining local adaptation (low divergence between donors and recipients) can enhance conservation success in the short term. On the other hand, reducing local adaptation in the short term by increasing genetic diversity (high divergence between some donors and recipients) might have better long‐term success in the face of changing environmental conditions. Both Hoffman et al. (2020) and a paper we previously published in a Special Issue on Maladaptation in Applied Conservation (Derry et al., 2019) provide frameworks and syntheses for how best to apply conservation strategies in light of genetic variation and adaptation. A key difference between these two studies was that whereas Derry et al. (2019) performed a quantitative meta‐analysis, Hoffman et al. (2020) relied on case studies and theoretical considerations, yielding slightly different conclusions. We here provide a summary of the two studies and contrast of the main similarities and differences between them, while highlighting terminology used to describe and explain main concepts.