Sensitivity of Climate Feedbacks to Vertical Resolution in a General Circulation Model. Issue 12 (25th June 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ingram, William; Bushell, Andrew C.
• Is Part Of: Geophysical research letters. Volume 48:Issue 12(2021)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2021-06-25
• Subjects: climate change -- climate sensitivity -- climate feedbacks -- GCM -- vertical resolution -- general circulation model; Geophysics -- Periodicals; Planets -- Periodicals; Lunar geology -- Periodicals; 550
• DOI: 10.1029/2020GL092268
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0094-8276

Abstract

Abstract: Many of the current, Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6), General Circulation Models (GCMs) show climate sensitivity higher than currently accepted uncertainty ranges. There is a weak correlation between increases in vertical resolution and in climate sensitivity from CMIP5. In particular, the MO Hadley Centre GCM's vertical resolution has more than doubled, and its climate sensitivity has also increased substantially. We therefore compare estimates of climate sensitivity from the CMIP6 model HadGEM3‐GC3.1‐LL, with 85 levels, and a version with 242 levels. This is far higher resolution than in any previously published simulations with a mainstream GCM, though still less than many scales important for clouds. The climate sensitivity and feedbacks, including the cloud feedback, change little. This suggests that vertical resolution did not drive recent increases in GCM climate sensitivity, though this result should be further tested in other GCMs and over a broader range of resolutions. Plain Language Summary: "Climate sensitivity" is how much climate is warmed, in the global and time average, by more CO2 in the air, largely from burning fossil fuels. However, it remains very uncertain. General Circulation Models (GCMs) are our most detailed and physically based models of climate, widely used in many sorts of study of possible climate change. "All models are wrong, but some are useful"—their complexity can make it hard to understand and so assess their behavior. They also have to approximate many physical processes on smaller scales—particularly cloud. More recent GCMs tend to have higher climate sensitivity, many higher than was ever thought likely. Cloud processes seem largely responsible. A possible cause is increased vertical resolution (calculations being done on more levels through the atmosphere) in the newer GCMs. There is a correlation between increased vertical resolution and increased climate sensitivity, but this could be by chance. We have therefore compared one new‐generation GCM with its standard vertical resolution and with 3 times higher (considerably higher than any previously published mainstream GCM work). The climate sensitivity barely changes, and the processes involved, including cloud processes, are clearly working almost identically. But other GCMs might be quite different. Key Points: Many Coupled Model Intercomparison Project 6 (CMIP6) General Circulation Models (GCMs) have climate sensitivities larger than the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change uncertainty range or other assessments, largely thanks to cloud feedbacks This increase in sensitivity is correlated with an increase in vertical resolution—particularly important for cloud processes However, tripling the vertical resolution in one CMIP6 GCM, we found that climate sensitivity and feedbacks barely change