A research agenda for the science of actionable knowledge: Drawing from a review of the most misguided to the most enlightened claims in the science-policy interface literature. Issue 144 (June 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jagannathan, Kripa; Emmanuel, Geniffer; Arnott, James; Mach, Katharine J.; Bamzai-Dodson, Aparna; Goodrich, Kristen; Meyer, Ryan; Neff, Mark; Sjostrom, K. Dana; Timm, Kristin M.F.; Turnhout, Esther; Wong-Parodi, Gabrielle; Bednarek, Angela T.; Meadow, Alison; Dewulf, Art; Kirchhoff, Christine J.; Moss, Richard H.; Nichols, Leah; Oldach, Eliza; Lemos, Maria Carmen; Klenk, Nicole
• Is Part Of: Environmental science & policy. Issue 144(2023)
• Page Start: 174
• Page End: 186
• Publication Date: 2023-06
• Subjects: Science-policy interface -- Actionable knowledge -- Decision-making -- Research agenda -- Science-society engagements -- Co-production; Environmental policy -- Periodicals; Environmental sciences -- Periodicals; Environnement -- Politique gouvernementale -- Périodiques; Sciences de l'environnement -- Périodiques; Environmental policy; Environmental sciences; Periodicals; Electronic journals; 363.70561
• DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2023.03.004
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1462-9011

Abstract

Abstract: Linking science with action affords a prime opportunity to leverage greater societal impact from research and increase the use of evidence in decision-making. Success in these areas depends critically upon processes of producing and mobilizing knowledge, as well as supporting and making decisions. For decades, scholars have idealized and described these social processes in different ways, resulting in numerous assumptions that now variously guide engagements at the interface of science and society. We systematically catalog these assumptions based on prior research on the science-policy interface, and further distill them into a set of 26 claims. We then elicit expert perspectives (n = 16) about these claims to assess the extent to which they are accurate or merit further examination. Out of this process, we construct a research agenda to motivate future scientific research on actionable knowledge, prioritizing areas that experts identified as critical gaps in understanding of the science-society interface. The resulting agenda focuses on how to define success, support intermediaries, build trust, and evaluate the importance of consensus and its alternatives – all in the diverse contexts of science-society-decision-making interactions. We further raise questions about the centrality of knowledge in these interactions, discussing how a governance lens might be generative of efforts to support more equitable processes and outcomes. We offer these suggestions with hopes of furthering the science of actionable knowledge as a transdisciplinary area of inquiry. Highlights: We conduct a systematic review of the literature on the science-policy interface. Based on the review, we identify 'claims' or key insights and assertions about SPI. Through an expert elicitation, we examine the claims that merit further research. We present a research agenda for future work on the science of actionable knowledge.