Analysis of tauopathy research funding between 2006 and 2016 reveals critical gaps in research priorities. Issue 1 (9th October 2018)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Altimus, Cara M.; Keller, Kirstie; Brannelly, Patrick; Ross, Erin; Lin, Chang‐Ting; Riley, Ekemini A. U.; Briggs, LaTese; Smith, Jeremy; Stevens, Melissa
• Is Part Of: Alzheimer's & dementia. Volume 15:Issue 1(2019)
• Page Start: 42
• Page End: 54
• Publication Date: 2018-10-09
• Subjects: Tauopathy -- neurodegeneration -- scientific funding; Alzheimer's disease -- Periodicals; Alzheimer Disease -- Periodicals; Dementia -- Periodicals; Démence; Maladie d'Alzheimer; Périodique électronique (Descripteur de forme); Ressource Internet (Descripteur de forme); 616.83
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jalz.2018.07.218
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1552-5260

Abstract

Abstract: Neurodegenerative diseases encompass a range of diagnoses, such as Alzheimer's disease and Parkinson's disease. Despite decades of advancements in understanding the neurobiology of individual diseases, this class has few disease‐modifying therapeutics and a paucity of biomarkers for diagnosis or progression. However, tau protein aggregation has emerged as a potential unifying factor across several neurodegenerative diseases, which has prompted a rapid growth in tau‐related funding. In spite of this growth, research funding in this area is not in line with the immense magnitude of disease burden, and drug discovery and clinical research remain underfunded. Coordinated, collaborative efforts are key to making an impact, which can and should be led by the major funding bodies within the tau space. Here we describe the development and analysis of a tau‐focused neurodegeneration funding database, which captures data from 2040 grants from 2006 to 2016. This database was developed as a public resource to allow funders, researchers, and policy makers to better understand tau funding patterns and to identify key funders and potential collaborations. This database can be used in conjunction with other neurodegenerative disease databases, such as the International Alzheimer's Disease Research Portfolio to gain specific insight into tau‐research funding. Over the study period, overall tau funding rose dramatically; however, changes in capital distribution also changed. Specifically, the field experienced a strong bias toward funding tau in the context of Alzheimer's disease, while at the same time generally decreasing the overall proportion of funding for basic research, treatment development, and evaluation. As funding organizations look forward, this resource can both inform future funding strategies and priority areas and identify potential collaborative efforts with complementary funding organizations.