Sex‐based and beauty‐based objectification: Metadehumanization and emotional consequences among victims. (27th January 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Chevallereau, Tina; Maurage, Pierre; Stinglhamber, Florence; Demoulin, Stéphanie
• Other Names: Sambaraju Rahul guestEditor.; McVittie Chris guestEditor.
• Is Part Of: British journal of social psychology. Volume 60:Part 4(2021)
• Page Start: 1218
• Page End: 1240
• Publication Date: 2021-01-27
• Subjects: beauty -- dehumanization -- metadehumanization -- objectification -- sexual objectification; Social psychology -- Periodicals; 302.05
• DOI: 10.1111/bjso.12446
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0144-6665

Abstract

Abstract : We investigated how two forms of objectification (i.e., sex‐ and beauty‐based objectification) relate to metadehumanization (i.e., the perception of being dehumanized) and emotional consequences for victims. Capitalizing on previous research, we hypothesized that sex‐based objectification would induce animalistic metadehumanization and that beauty‐based objectification would induce mechanistic metadehumanization. Our four studies showed that sex‐based objectification elicits stronger mechanistic metadehumanization than beauty‐based objectification, which also elicits higher mechanistic metadehumanization than non‐objectifying control condition. Unexpectedly, animalistic metadehumanization did not vary across conditions. These findings suggest that, consistent with the social metaphor, objectified women feel mechanistically dehumanized, independently of the objectification type faced. Sex‐ and beauty‐based objectifications also elicit more anger but less sadness than the control condition. However, only sex‐based objectification increases guilt feelings. The general discussion contrasts perpetrators' vision of objectified women to women's own experience of objectification.