Clinical prediction tools for identifying antimicrobial-resistant organism (ARO) carriage on hospital admissions: a systematic review. (April 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Jeon, D.; Chavda, S.; Rennert-May, E.; Leal, J.
• Is Part Of: Journal of hospital infection. Volume 134(2023)
• Page Start: 11
• Page End: 26
• Publication Date: 2023-04
• Subjects: Antimicrobial-resistant organisms -- MRSA -- CPOs -- Screening -- Clinical prediction -- Electronic medical records; Cross infection -- Periodicals; Cross infection -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Nosocomial infections -- Periodicals; Nosocomial infections -- Prevention -- Periodicals; Cross Infection -- Periodicals; Cross Infection -- prevention & control -- Periodicals; Infection Control -- Periodicals; Electronic journals; 614.44
• DOI: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.01.003
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0195-6701

Abstract

Summary: Background: Increasing prevalence of antimicrobial-resistant organisms (AROs) is a growing economic and healthcare challenge. Increasing utilization of electronic medical record (EMR) systems and improvements in computation and analytical techniques afford an opportunity to reduce the spread of AROs through the development of clinical prediction tools to identify ARO carriers on admission to hospital. Aim: To identify existing clinical prediction tools for meticillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) and carbapenemase-producing organisms (CPOs), their predictive performance, and risk factors utilized in these tools. Methods: The CHARMS checklist was followed. Medline, EMBASE, Cochrane SR, CRD databases (DARE, NHS EED), CINAHL and Web of Science were searched from database inception to 26 th July 2021. Full-text articles were assessed independently, and quality assessment was conducted using the Prediction Model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool. Findings: In total, 3809 abstracts were identified and 22 studies were included. Among these studies, risk score models were the most common prediction tool ( N =16). Previous admission, recent antibiotic exposure, age and sex were the most common risk factors for ARO carriage. Prediction tools were commonly evaluated on sensitivity and specificity with ranges of 15–100% and 46–98.6%, respectively, for MRSA, and 30–81.3% and 79.8–99.9%, respectively, for CPOs. Conclusion: There is no gold standard ARO prediction tool. However, high-performance clinical prediction tools and identification of key risk factors for the early detection of AROs exist. Risk score models are easier to use and interpret; however, with recent improvements in machine learning techniques, highly robust models can be developed with data stored in an EMR.