Below- versus above-elbow cast treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures in children: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. (June 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Alzobi, Osama Z; Hantouly, Ashraf T; Kenawey, Mohamed; Ibrahim, Talal
• Is Part Of: Journal of children's orthopaedics. Volume 17:Number 3(2023)
• Page Start: 249
• Page End: 258
• Publication Date: 2023-06
• Subjects: Displaced distal forearm fractures -- pediatrics -- cast -- randomized controlled trial -- meta-analysis; Pediatric orthopedics -- Periodicals; 618.927005
• DOI: 10.1177/18632521231162621
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1863-2521

Abstract

Objectives: Distal forearm fractures are the most common pediatric fractures. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness of below-elbow cast treatment for displaced distal forearm fractures in children compared to above-elbow cast through meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Methods: Several databases from January 1, 2000 until October 1, 2021 were searched for randomized controlled trials that assessed below versus above-elbow cast treatment of displaced distal forearm fractures in pediatric patients. The main meta-analysis comparison was based on the relative risk of loss of fracture reduction between children undergoing below versus above-elbow cast treatment. Other outcome measures including re-manipulation and cast-related complications were also investigated. Results: Nine studies were eligible of the 156 articles identified, with a total of 1049 children. Analysis was undertaken for all included studies with a sensitivity analysis conducted for studies with high quality. In the sensitivity analysis, the relative risks of loss of fracture reduction (relative risk = 0.6, 95% confidence interval = 0.38, 0.96) and re-manipulation (relative risk = 0.3, 95% confidence interval = 0.19, 0.48) between the below and above-elbow cast groups were in favor of below-elbow cast and statistically significant. Cast-related complications were in favor of below-elbow cast but did not attain statistical significance (relative risk = 0.45, 95% confidence interval = 0.05, 3.99). Loss of fracture reduction was noted in 28.9% of patients treated with above-elbow cast and 21.5% in below-elbow cast. Re-manipulation was attempted in 48.1% versus 53.8% of children who lost fracture reduction in the below-elbow cast and above-elbow cast groups, respectively. Conclusion: Below-elbow cast treatment was favored, with statistical significance, in terms of loss of fracture reduction and re-manipulation, and was not associated with a higher risk of cast-related complications. The accumulative evidence currently does not support above-elbow cast treatment and below-elbow cast treatment should be the mainstay for displaced distal forearm fractures in children. Level of evidence: Level I, meta-analysis of therapeutic level I studies.