Dimensional ridge changes in conjunction with four implant timing protocols and two types of soft tissue grafts: A pilot pre‐clinical study. (31st January 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Lee, Kwang‐Seok; Shin, Seung‐Yun; Hämmerle, Christoph H. F.; Jung, Ui‐Won; Lim, Hyun‐Chang; Thoma, Daniel S.
• Is Part Of: Journal of clinical periodontology. Volume 49:Number 4(2022)
• Page Start: 401
• Page End: 411
• Publication Date: 2022-01-31
• Subjects: connective tissue graft -- implant placement -- tissue remodelling -- volume‐stable cross‐linked collagen matrix; Periodontics -- Periodicals; 617.6
• DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.13594
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0303-6979

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: To determine the effect of (1) implant placement timing and (2) the type of soft tissue graft in terms of ridge profile changes. Materials and Methods: Four implant treatment modalities were applied in the mesial root areas of the third and fourth mandibular premolars of 10 mongrel dogs alongside connective‐tissue graft (CTG) and volume‐stable cross‐linked collagen matrix (VCMX): immediate, early, and delayed placement (DP), and DP following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP). All dogs were sacrificed 3 months after soft tissue augmentation. Standard Tessellation Language files from designated time points were analysed. Results: Compared with the pre‐extraction situation, the median width of the ridge demontstrated a linear increase only in group ARP/CTG (0.07 mm at the 2‐mm level), whereas all other groups showed a reduction (between −1.87 and −0.09 mm, p > .05). Groups ARP/CTG (0.17 mm) and DP/CTG (0.05 mm) exhibited a profilometric tissue gain in a set region of interest ( p > .05). The net effect of CTG and VCMX ranged from 0.14 to 0.79 mm. Conclusions: Dimensional ridge changes varied between treatment protocols. ARP with CTG led to the smallest difference in ridge profile between the pre‐extraction and the study end time point. Both CTG and VCMX enhanced the ridge contour.