Clinically Interpretable Machine Learning Models for Early Prediction of Mortality in Older Patients with Multiple Organ Dysfunction Syndrome: An International Multicenter Retrospective Study. Issue 4 (3rd June 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Liu, Xiaoli; DuMontier, Clark; Hu, Pan; Liu, Chao; Yeung, Wesley; Mao, Zhi; Ho, Vanda; Thoral, Patrick J; Kuo, Po-Chih; Hu, Jie; Li, Deyu; Cao, Desen; Mark, Roger G; Zhou, FeiHu; Zhang, Zhengbo; Celi, Leo Anthony
• Editors: Lipsitz, Lewis A
• Is Part Of: Journals of gerontology. Volume 78:Issue 4(2023)
• Page Start: 718
• Page End: 726
• Publication Date: 2022-06-03
• Subjects: International multicenter -- Interpretable models -- Machine learning -- Mortality -- Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome; Geriatrics -- Periodicals; Gerontology -- Periodicals; 618.97
• DOI: 10.1093/gerona/glac107
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1079-5006

Abstract

Abstract: Background: Multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) is associated with a high risk of mortality among older patients. Current severity scores are limited in their ability to assist clinicians with triage and management decisions. We aim to develop mortality prediction models for older patients with MODS admitted to the ICU. Methods: The study analyzed older patients from 197 hospitals in the United States and 1 hospital in the Netherlands. The cohort was divided into the young-old (65–80 years) and old-old (≥80 years), which were separately used to develop and evaluate models including internal, external, and temporal validation. Demographic characteristics, comorbidities, vital signs, laboratory measurements, and treatments were used as predictors. We used the XGBoost algorithm to train models, and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method to interpret predictions. Results: Thirty-four thousand four hundred and ninety-seven young-old (11.3% mortality) and 21 330 old-old (15.7% mortality) patients were analyzed. Discrimination AUROC of internal validation models in 9 046 U.S. patients was as follows: 0.87 and 0.82, respectively; discrimination of external validation models in 1 905 EUR patients was as follows: 0.86 and 0.85, respectively; and discrimination of temporal validation models in 8 690 U.S. patients: 0.85 and 0.78, respectively. These models outperformed standard clinical scores like Sequential Organ Failure Assessment and Acute Physiology Score III. The Glasgow Coma Scale, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and Code Status emerged as top predictors of mortality. Conclusions: Our models integrate data spanning physiologic and geriatric-relevant variables that outperform existing scores used in older adults with MODS, which represents a proof of concept of how machine learning can streamline data analysis for busy ICU clinicians to potentially optimize prognostication and decision making.