A conceptual framework and research method for understanding protected area governance: varying approaches and epistemic worldviews about human-nature relations. Issue 7 (7th June 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Li, Jingyu; Stoffelen, Arie; Vanclay, Frank
• Is Part Of: Journal of environmental planning and management. Volume 66:Issue 7(2023)
• Page Start: 1393
• Page End: 1412
• Publication Date: 2023-06-07
• Subjects: protected area management -- socio-ecological systems -- stakeholder analysis -- community engagement -- fortress conservation; City planning -- Periodicals; City planning -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; Regional planning -- Periodicals; Regional planning -- Great Britain -- Periodicals; 333.7
• DOI: 10.1080/09640568.2022.2034605
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0964-0568

Abstract

Abstract : Research about the relations between protected areas and local communities ranges from nature-centred to human-centred approaches. Differing epistemic worldviews and fragmentation characterize this literature. We analyzed the rationale underpinning approaches to protected area governance. We classified them according to their perspective on human-nature relations. Using the components of stakeholder mapping, and adding the concepts of human-nature interaction, landscape values, and land-use preferences, we designed a conceptual framework and research method to improve understanding of the governance of specific protected areas. The method comprises 6 steps: (1) identify all stakeholders; (2) identify those stakeholders in power positions and determine their view of nature; (3) establish the landscape values and preferences of other stakeholder groups; (4) study the institutional context and power relations; (5) consider the agency and capacity of each group and their engagement with the protected area; and (6) determine what recommendations might be made to improve protected area governance.