Machine learning models in predicting graft survival in kidney transplantation: meta-analysis. Issue 2 (29th March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Ravindhran, Bharadhwaj; Chandak, Pankaj; Schafer, Nicole; Kundalia, Kaushal; Hwang, Woochan; Antoniadis, Savvas; Haroon, Usman; Zakri, Rhana Hassan
• Is Part Of: BJS open. Volume 7:Issue 2(2023)
• Publication Date: 2023-03-29
• Subjects: Surgery -- Periodicals; 617.005
• DOI: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrad011
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2474-9842

Abstract

Abstract: Background: The variations in outcome and frequent occurrence of kidney allograft failure continue to pose important clinical and research challenges despite recent advances in kidney transplantation. The aim of this systematic review was to examine the current application of machine learning models in kidney transplantation and perform a meta-analysis of these models in the prediction of graft survival. Methods: This review was registered with the PROSPERO database (CRD42021247469) and all peer-reviewed original articles that reported machine learning model-based prediction of graft survival were included. Quality assessment was performed by the criteria defined by Qiao and risk-of-bias assessment was performed using the PROBAST tool. The diagnostic performance of the meta-analysis was assessed by a meta-analysis of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic plot. Results: A total of 31 studies met the inclusion criteria for the review and 27 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Twenty-nine different machine learning models were used to predict graft survival in the included studies. Nine studies compared the predictive performance of machine learning models with traditional regression methods. Five studies had a high risk of bias and three studies had an unclear risk of bias. The area under the hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.82 and the summary sensitivity and specificity of machine learning-based models were 0.81 (95 per cent c.i. 0.76 to 0.86) and 0.81 (95 per cent c.i. 0.74 to 0.86) respectively for the overall model. The diagnostic odds ratio for the overall model was 18.24 (95 per cent c.i. 11.00 to 30.16) and 29.27 (95 per cent c.i. 13.22 to 44.46) based on the sensitivity analyses. Conclusion: Prediction models using machine learning methods may improve the prediction of outcomes after kidney transplantation by the integration of the vast amounts of non-linear data. Abstract : This systematic review explores the current application of machine learning models and performs a meta-analysis of these models in the prediction of graft survival after kidney transplantation. We aim to summarize the current available evidence, identify the best machine learning models suited for these outcomes, and the key challenges that need to be addressed to accurately guide future research in this topic. Prediction models using machine learning methods can better predict outcomes after kidney transplantation by the integration of the vast amounts of non-linear data.