Alternative splicing: An overlooked mechanism contributing to local adaptation?. Issue 20 (6th October 2021)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Salisbury, Sarah J.; Delgado, M. Lisette; Dalziel, Anne C.
• Is Part Of: Molecular ecology. Volume 30:Issue 20(2021)
• Page Start: 4951
• Page End: 4954
• Publication Date: 2021-10-06
• Subjects: Adaptation -- Ecological Genetics -- Fish -- Transcriptomics; Molecular ecology -- Periodicals; Molecular population biology -- Periodicals; 576
• DOI: 10.1111/mec.16177
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0962-1083

Abstract

Abstract : Identifying the molecular mechanisms contributing to phenotypic variation in natural populations is a major goal of molecular ecology. However, the multiple regulatory steps between genotype and phenotype mean that many potential mechanisms can lead to trait divergence. To date, the role of transcriptional regulation in local adaptation has received much focus, as we can readily measure mRNA quantity and have a reasonable grasp of how variation in the expression of many protein‐coding genes can influence phenotype. Thus, studying the evolution of protein‐coding gene mRNA abundance in candidate tissues has led to successes in detecting the molecular mechanisms underlying local adaptation (reviewed by Hill et al., 2021). However, the contribution of differential splicing of precursor mRNA (pre‐mRNA) to adaptive differentiation, as well as the loci controlling this variation, remains largely unexplored in wild populations. In their "From the Cover'" article in this issue of Molecular Ecology, Jacobs and Elmer (2021) reanalyse muscle RNA sequencing (RNA‐seq) data to quantify the relative contributions of variation in mRNA quantity (differentially expressed "DE" genes) and splice variant identity (differentially spliced "DS" genes) to parallel divergence of wild "benthic" and "pelagic" ecotypes of a salmonid fish, the Arctic charr ( Salvelinus alpinus ). They found little overlap in the identity and biological functions of DE and DS genes, suggesting that these two regulatory mechanisms act on different cellular traits to complementarily alter organismal phenotype. Furthermore, many DE and DS genes could be mapped to cis ‐acting QTL, arguing that some of this regulatory divergence is genetically based. DE and DS genes were also more likely to be "hub genes" than their nondivergent counterparts, hinting that this regulatory variation may have a variety of phenotypic effects. The comparison of three independently evolved pairs of benthic and pelagic charr uncovered greater than expected parallelism in both expression and splicing between ecotypes across different lakes, supporting a role for these molecular phenotypes in adaptive divergence. Overall, the findings of Jacobs and Elmer (2021) highlight the importance of alternative splicing as a potential mechanism underlying local adaptation and provide a framework for others hoping to make the most of their RNA‐seq data.