South–South Knowledge Production and Hegemony: Searching for Africa in Chinese Theories of IR. Issue 1 (9th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Carrozza, Ilaria; Benabdallah, Lina
• Is Part Of: International studies review. Volume 24:Issue 1(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-02-09
• Subjects: global south -- international relations theory -- knowledge production -- Palabras clave -- Sur global -- teoría de las relaciones internacionales -- producción de conocimiento -- Mots clés -- pays du sud -- théorie des relations internationales -- production de connaissances; International relations -- Periodicals; World politics -- Periodicals; 320.05
• DOI: 10.1093/isr/viab063
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1521-9488

Abstract

Abstract: There is a growing community of international relations (IR) scholars who argue for the importance of investigating Global South approaches to IR scholarship, making room for theories and concepts that challenge the discipline's Eurocentricity, and debating the merits and pitfalls of globalizing IR by including perspectives from various Global South locations. In addition to acknowledging this existing critical scholarship that aims at resisting mainstream epistemologies and methodologies of knowing and doing IR, this article's central contribution is to probe the epistemic hegemony and knowledge-production hierarchies that are emerging from within the Global South. The article does not seek to uncover the truth about the representation of Global South actors by Global South IR communities. Instead, it is interested in demonstrating how epistemic hegemony and knowledge-production hierarchies do not exist only in relationships of exclusion and Othering but also in relations of inclusion and Selving. We illustrate our argument with an analysis of the representations of "Africa" in China-based IR intellectual communities. We find that Chinese discourses on solidarity, friendship, community, and shared history lead to a narrative of sameness and Selving whereby Chinese postcolonial experiences are taken to be expandable and applicable to other developing states, making Chinese perspectives seem representative of others, thereby silencing and representing African voices at once.