Comparison of automated breast volume scanning with conventional ultrasonography, mammography, and MRI to assess residual breast cancer after neoadjuvant therapy by molecular type. Issue 5 (May 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Peng, Y.; Yuan, F.; Xie, F.; Yang, H.; Wang, S.; Wang, C.; Yang, Y.; Du, W.; Liu, M.; Wang, S.
• Is Part Of: Clinical radiology. Volume 78:Issue 5(2023)
• Page Start: e393
• Page End: e400
• Publication Date: 2023-05
• Subjects: Medical radiology -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiotherapy -- Periodicals; Radiology -- Periodicals; Societies, Medical -- Periodicals; Medical radiology; Radiotherapy; Electronic journals; Periodicals; 616.0757
• DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2022.12.002
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0009-9260

Abstract

Abstract : AIM: To compare the accuracy of hand-held ultrasonography (US), mammography (MG), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and automated breast volume scanning (ABVS) in defining residual breast cancer tumour size after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients diagnosed breast cancer and who received NAT at the Breast Center, Peking University People's Hospital, were enrolled prospectively. Imaging was performed after the last cycle of NAT. The residual tumour size, intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs), and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) to predict pathological complete response (pCR) were analysed. RESULTS: A total of 156 patients with 159 tumours were analysed. ABVS had a moderate correlation with histopathology residual tumour size (ICC = 0.666), and showed high agreement among triple-positive tumours (ICC = 0.797). With 5 mm as the threshold, the coincidence rate reached 64.7% between ABVS and pathological size, which was significantly higher than that between US, MG, MRI, and pathological size (50%, 45.1%, 41.4%; p= 0.009, p= 0.001, p< 0.001, respectively). For ROC analysis, ABVS demonstrated a higher area under the ROC curve, but with no statistical difference, except for MG (0.855, 0.816, 0.819, and 0.788, respectively; p= 0.183 for US, p= 0.044 for MG, and p= 0.397 for MRI, with ABVS as the reference). CONCLUSIONS: The longest tumour diameter on ABVS had a moderate correlation with pathological residual invasive tumour size. ABVS was shown to have good ability to predict pCR and would appear to be a potential useful tool for the assessment after NAT for breast cancer. Highlights: Automated breast volume scanning. Imaging assessment. Neoadjuvant therapy. Residual tumor.