Training Effectiveness and Impact on Safety, Treatment Quality, and Communication in Prehospital Emergency Care: The Prospective Longitudinal Mixed-Methods EPPTC Trial. Issue 2 (March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Häske, David; Beckers, Stefan K.; Dieroff, Marc; Gliwitzky, Bernhard; Hofmann, Marzellus; Lefering, Rolf; Münzberg, Matthias
• Is Part Of: Journal of patient safety. Volume 18:Issue 2(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-03
• Subjects: out-of-hospital -- trauma -- education -- evidence -- performance; Patients -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Medicine -- Practice -- Safety measures -- Periodicals; Medical errors -- Prevention -- Periodicals; 610.289
• DOI: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000000969
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1549-8417

Abstract

Abstract : Background: Emergency training is designed to improve medical care teams' knowledge, practical skills, and treatment procedures in patient care to increase patient safety. This requires effective training, but the multifactorial effects of training are difficult to measure. Methods: We assessed the impact of emergency team training on treatment procedures and quality, processes, technical skills, and nontechnical skills in simulated trauma emergencies in a longitudinal analysis, using videos that were recorded before ( t 0 ), immediately after ( t 1 ), and 1 year after the training ( t 2 ). The training was evaluated with the validated PERFECT checklist, which includes 7 scales: primary assessment, secondary assessment, procedures, technical skills, trauma communication, nontechnical skills, and a global performance scale. The primary end point was the change from before a training intervention ( t 0 ) to 1 year after training ( t 2 ), measured by a metric point score. The second end point was the impact of the intervention from before training to after and from immediately after training to 1 year later. Results: A total of 146 trainings were evaluated. In simulated traumatological emergencies, training participants showed significantly better treatment capacity after 1 year ( t 0 : 28.8 ± 5.6 points versus t 2 : 59.6 ± 6.6 points, P < 0.001), with greater improvement from t 0 to t 1 (28.8 ± 5.6 points versus 65.1 ± 7.9 points, P < 0.001). The most significant change from t 0 to t 2 was seen in the primary assessment, with a mean change of 11.1 ± 5.1, followed by the scale of the procedure (6.1 ± 3.0) and nontechnical skills (6.0 ± 3.0). Conclusions: Team trainings with intensive scenario training and short theoretical inputs lead to a significant improvement in simulated care of severely injured patients, especially in identifying and intervening in life-threatening symptoms, processes, and nontechnical skills, even 1 year after the course. Positive, longitudinally positive effects were also in communication and subjective safety of prehospital health care personnel.