A Penalty Method for Coupling of Finite‐Element and Peridynamic Models. Issue 1 (24th March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Pernatii, Anna; Gabbert, Ulrich; Naumenko, Konstantin; Hesse, Jan-Timo; Willberg, Christian
• Other Names: Böhm Ch. guestEditor.; Mang K. guestEditor.; Markert B. guestEditor.; Reese S. guestEditor.; Schmidtchen M. guestEditor.; Waimann J. guestEditor.; Kaliske M. editorInChief.
• Is Part Of: Proceedings in applied mathematics and mechanics. Volume 22:Issue 1(2023)
• Page Start: n/a
• Page End: n/a
• Publication Date: 2023-03-24
• Subjects: Applied mathematics -- Periodicals; Engineering mathematics -- Periodicals; Mathematical physics -- Periodicals; 519
• DOI: 10.1002/pamm.202200151
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1617-7061

Abstract

Abstract: A classical continuum mechanics model no longer fulfills its basic assumptions, when the deformations are not smooth or discontinuous. Peridynamics (PD) as an integral formulation could better overcome these issues. Therefore, it is better suited to solve fracture problems such as crack initiation, its growth and formation of crack patterns. In PD the magnitudes of internal forces at a material point depend on the collective interaction of all material points within a subdomain called horizon. To take advances from the formulation, typically it is implemented in a mesh‐free form. In that case, it is easy to separate interactions between different material points. As consequence, a relatively high resolution is required to describe continuous deformation functions and, consequently computationally expensive. Therefore, the application of mesh‐free PD in undamaged regions requires an unnecessary high effort for receiving sufficient accurate results. In contrast, the finite element method (FEM) as a classical continuum mechanics‐based approach, is very efficient, if continuous stress distributions can be assumed. Consequently, a computational cost reduction can be achieved, if the PD is applied in the local damaged zone only and the remaining area is modeled and analyzed with the classical FEM. Realization of such an approach requires a sufficient accurate coupling of the PD and the FEM subdomains. A brief overview about different coupling approaches is given. Then the general approach of an Arlequin based method is presented. Here the coupling is achieved via an overlapping of PD and FEM areas. The coupling equations are developed and realized with help of the Penalty method. The Penalty method is considered as an alternative procedure to the Lagrange multiplier strategy without creating new unknowns, which essentially simplifies the coupled PD‐FEM approach. The validity and limits of the proposed technique are demonstrated through analysis, where the choice of the Penalty number is discussed as well as artificial wave oscillations, caused by the coupling area.