Advanced Imaging and New Cardiac Biomarkers in Long-term Follow-up After Childhood Cancer. Issue 2 (March 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Sitte, Vanessa; Burkhardt, Barbara; Weber, Roland; Kretschmar, Oliver; Hersberger, Martin; Bergsträsser, Eva; Christmann, Martin
• Is Part Of: Journal of pediatric hematology/oncology. Volume 44:Issue 2(2022)
• Publication Date: 2022-03
• Subjects: childhood cancer -- cardiotoxicity -- cardiac biomarkers -- extracellular matrix remodeling; Pediatric hematology -- Periodicals; Tumors in children -- Periodicals; 618.9215
• DOI: 10.1097/MPH.0000000000002156
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1077-4114

Abstract

Abstract : Objectives: Pathologic ejection fraction (EF), shortening fraction (FS), and standard heart failure biomarkers (high sensitive troponin T and N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide) during follow-up after childhood cancer have been associated with irreversible cardiac damage. We aimed to evaluate strain imaging values by echocardiography and new biomarkers for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) as potential more sensitive parameters for cardiac deterioration in childhood cancer survivors (CCS). Materials and Methods: Prospective study with 50 CCS (median 16.2 y) at a median follow-up of 13 years. In addition to standard echo and laboratory parameters for heart failure, strain measurements and new biomarkers, including myocardial inflammation (interleukin 6), extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling (C-telopeptide for type I collagen, intact N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen), and other heart failure biomarkers (galectin 3, solutable ST2, growth differentiation factor 15), were obtained and compared with 50 healthy controls. Results: No significant differences in EF, FS, high sensitive troponin T, N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide, interleukin 6, solutable ST2, and galectin 3 were found between study and control groups. In contrast, strain imaging showed significant differences between both groups (global longitudinal strainGLS −16.1% vs. −20.4%, P <0.0001; global circumferential strain −14.3 vs. −21.4%, P <0.0001), detecting 66% (global longitudinal strain) and 76% (global circumferential strain) of patients with pathologic values in contrast to 6% (EF) and 16% (FS) for standard parameters. Markers for disturbances of ECM remodeling (C-telopeptide for type I collagen, intact N-terminal propeptide of type III procollagen, each P <0.0001) and growth differentiation factor 15 ( P <0.0001) were significantly different between the groups. Conclusion: Strain imaging and new cardiac biomarkers used in HFpEF focusing on ECM remodeling appear to be more sensitive in detecting early remodeling processes in CCS than standard echo and laboratory parameters.