Lipid oxidation controls peptide self-assembly near membranes through a surface attraction mechanism. Issue 14 (2nd March 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: John, Torsten; Piantavigna, Stefania; Dealey, Tiara J. A.; Abel, Bernd; Risselada, Herre Jelger; Martin, Lisandra L.
• Is Part Of: Chemical science. Volume 14:Issue 14(2023)
• Page Start: 3730
• Page End: 3741
• Publication Date: 2023-03-02
• Subjects: Chemistry -- Periodicals; 540.5
• DOI: 10.1039/d3sc00159h
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 2041-6520

Abstract

Abstract : Oxidized model membranes have differential effects on peptide fibril formation, driven by surface attraction, peptide charge and secondary structure stabilization. Abstract : The self-assembly of peptides into supramolecular structures has been linked to neurodegenerative diseases but has also been observed in functional roles. Peptides are physiologically exposed to crowded environments of biomacromolecules, and particularly cellular membrane lipids. Previous research has shown that membranes can both accelerate and inhibit peptide self-assembly. Here, we studied the impact of membrane models that mimic cellular oxidative stress and compared this to mammalian and bacterial membranes. Using molecular dynamics simulations and experiments, we propose a model that explains how changes in peptide-membrane binding, electrostatics, and peptide secondary structure stabilization determine the nature of peptide self-assembly. We explored the influence of zwitterionic (POPC), anionic (POPG) and oxidized (PazePC) phospholipids, as well as cholesterol, and mixtures thereof, on the self-assembly kinetics of the amyloid β (1–40) peptide (Aβ40 ), linked to Alzheimer's disease, and the amyloid-forming antimicrobial peptide uperin 3.5 (U3.5). We show that the presence of an oxidized lipid had similar effects on peptide self-assembly as the bacterial mimetic membrane. While Aβ40 fibril formation was accelerated, U3.5 aggregation was inhibited by the same lipids at the same peptide-to-lipid ratio. We attribute these findings and peptide-specific effects to differences in peptide-membrane adsorption with U3.5 being more strongly bound to the membrane surface and stabilized in an α-helical conformation compared to Aβ40 . Different peptide-to-lipid ratios resulted in different effects. We found that electrostatic interactions are a primary driving force for peptide-membrane interaction, enabling us to propose a model for predicting how cellular changes might impact peptide self-assembly in vivo .