Utility of temporal self‐regulation theory in health and social behaviours: A meta‐analysis. Issue 2 (20th November 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Dorina, Indita; Mullan, Barbara; Boyes, Mark; Liddelow, Caitlin
• Is Part Of: British journal of health psychology. Volume 28:Issue 2(2023)
• Page Start: 397
• Page End: 438
• Publication Date: 2022-11-20
• Subjects: health behaviour -- intention‐behaviour gap -- meta‐analysis -- social behaviour -- temporal self‐regulation theory; Clinical health psychology -- Periodicals; 613.019
• DOI: 10.1111/bjhp.12631
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1359-107X

Abstract

Abstract: Purpose: Temporal self‐regulation theory was developed to address an observed intention‐behaviour gap across behaviours. However, a synthesis of studies has not yet been conducted to investigate the theory's utility to explain behaviour and bridge the intention‐behaviour gap. This review aimed to evaluate the predictive ability of temporal self‐regulation theory to understanding behaviour and pre‐registered at PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021253174). Method: Forward citation searches on the original theory publication through Google Scholar until May 2021 identified 37 eligible articles, including, 12, 555 participants assessing at least two of the three theory constructs. Random‐effects meta‐analyses assessed the strength of associations between theory constructs on behaviour and random effects meta‐regressions assessed moderators of behaviour. Results: Findings provide support for temporal self‐regulation theory to explain behaviour with very weak (self‐regulatory capacity r = .039, CI = .00, –.07) to moderate (intention r = .331, CI = .26, .40; behavioural pre‐potency r = .379, CI = .32, .44) effect sizes. Further, the strength of associations varied across behaviour types and contexts. However, there was high heterogeneity across studies and some moderating effects could not be assessed due to insufficient numbers of studies assessing interactions. Conclusions: We urge researchers to assess and report interactions for better understanding of the drivers of behaviour to develop effective interventions for positive behaviour change.