Dentine thickness in maxillary fused molars depends on the fusion type: An ex vivo micro‐computed tomography study. (2nd February 2023)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Keskin, Cangül; Toplu, Defne; Keleş, Ali
• Is Part Of: International endontic journal. Volume 56:Number 5(2023)
• Page Start: 637
• Page End: 646
• Publication Date: 2023-02-02
• Subjects: danger zone -- dentine thickness -- endodontics -- fusion -- microtomography -- root canal anatomy; Endodontics -- Periodicals; 617.6342
• DOI: 10.1111/iej.13891
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 0143-2885

Abstract

Abstract: Aim: The present study aimed to determine and compare the dentine thickness around the root canals of maxillary molars with fusion using micro‐computed tomography (micro‐CT). Methodology: A total of 120 fused maxillary molars having more than a single canal with distinct canal orifices near the cementoenamel junction were selected from a pool of extracted maxillary molars, which were scanned on a micro‐CT device (SkyScan 1172, Bruker‐microCT). The minimum dentine thickness around the root canals in furcal direction was measured using CTAn software (v.1.18.8 Bruker‐microCT) at each millimetre. The specimens were grouped according to their fusion type, and dentine thickness around the canals was compared. The data were statistically analysed using anova and post hoc Tukey–Kramer tests following an assessment of the normality of their distribution with the Kolmogorov–Smirnov test ( p < .05). Results: Dentine thickness showed a statistically significant decrease at 2 mm apical to the orifice level irrespective of fusion type. The minimum dentine thickness values were detected around the second mesiobuccal canal as 0.30 mm at 6 mm below orifice. Dentine thickness around the mesiobuccal canal was significantly greater in fusion type 1 than those of types 2 and 3 ( p < .05), while those of distobuccal and palatal canals were significantly thinner in type 3 fusion compared with type 1 or 6 ( p Dentine thickness showed a statistically significant decrease at 2 mm apical to the orifice level irrespective of fusion type. The minimum dentine thickness values were detected around the second mesiobuccal canal as 0.30 mm at 6 mm below orifice. Dentine thickness around the mesiobuccal canal was significantly greater in fusion type 1 than those of types 2 and 3 ( Conclusion: Minimum dentine thickness values at the danger zone of distobuccal and palatal canals change according to the fusion type in fused maxillary second molars.