Predicting malignant pleural effusion during diagnostic pleuroscopy with biopsy: A prospective multicentre study. Issue 5 (17th February 2022)

• Record Type: Journal Article
• Authors: Grosu, Horiana B.; Kern, Ryan; Maldonado, Fabien; Casal, Roberto; Andersen, Clark R.; Li, Liang; Eapen, Georgie; Ost, David; Jimenez, Carlos; Frangopoulos, Frangiskos; Sabath, Bruce; Vakil, Erik; Schwalk, Audra; Marcoux, Mathieu; Sagar, Ala Eddin; Nasim, Faria; Lin, Julie; Salahudin, Moiz; Arain, Hasan Muhammad; Noor, Laila; Montanez, Diana; Stewart, John; Mullon, John; Michael, Michalis; Porfyridis, Ilias
• Is Part Of: Respirology. Volume 27:Issue 5(2022)
• Page Start: 350
• Page End: 356
• Publication Date: 2022-02-17
• Subjects: malignant pleural effusion -- pleurodesis -- pleuroscopy -- ROSE -- thoracoscopy -- touch preparation; Respiratory organs -- Diseases -- Periodicals; Respiratory organs -- Periodicals; 612.2
• DOI: 10.1111/resp.14232
• Languages: English
• ISSNs: 1323-7799

Abstract

Abstract: Background and objective: Pleuroscopy with pleural biopsy has a high sensitivity for malignant pleural effusion (MPE). Because MPEs tend to recur, concurrent diagnosis and treatment of MPE during pleuroscopy is desired. However, proceeding directly to treatment at the time of pleuroscopy requires confidence in the on‐site diagnosis. The study's primary objective was to create a predictive model to estimate the probability of MPE during pleuroscopy. Methods: A prospective observational multicentre cohort study of consecutive patients undergoing pleuroscopy was conducted. We used a logistic regression model to evaluate the probability of MPE with relation to visual assessment, rapid on‐site evaluation (ROSE) of touch preparation and presence of pleural nodules/masses on computed tomography (CT). To assess the model's prediction accuracy, a bootstrapped training/testing approach was utilized to estimate the cross‐validated area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Results: Of the 201 patients included in the study, 103 had MPE. Logistic regression showed that higher level of malignancy on visual assessment is associated with higher odds of MPE (OR = 34.68, 95% CI = 9.17–131.14, p < 0.001). The logistic regression also showed that higher level of malignancy on ROSE of touch preparation is associated with higher odds of MPE (OR = 11.63, 95% CI = 3.85–35.16, p < 0.001). Presence of pleural nodules/masses on CT is associated with higher odds of MPE (OR = 6.61, 95% CI = 1.97–22.1, p = 0.002). A multivariable logistic regression model of final pathologic status with relation to visual assessment, ROSE of touch preparation and presence of pleural nodules/masses on CT had a cross‐validated AUC of 0.94 (95% CI = 0.91–0.97). Conclusion: A prediction model using visual assessment, ROSE of touch preparation and CT scan findings demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy for MPE. Further validation studies are needed to confirm our findings. Abstract : Factors such as visual assessment, rapid on‐site evaluation of touch preparation and computed tomography scan findings demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy for malignant pleural effusion (MPE) during pleuroscopy with biopsy for exudative cytology‐negative pleural effusions. Immediate MPE diagnosis could prevent the need for a second thoracoscopy for pleurodesis.